it's also ridiculous to suggest men are being "forced" to do anything. If it truly was a matter out of your control, it wouldn't be a sin and you wouldn't need to worry.
When a woman dresses immodestly and a man eyes her up, there are two sinners there, not just one sinner and a victim.
Being forced to look at a specific object or area is not a sin. No one is saying that pants force a sin. We're saying that pants force a visual temptation, which is not a sin on the part of man (assuming he rejects the temptation) but it IS a sin for the woman, because for he to be an occasion of sin is a sin itself.
Not all pants are a grave occasion to sin, but many modern styles are. Women who wear these styles are not acting like catholics and are walking billboards for causing scandal, even if every man who sees them does not consent.
To deny that pants promote the eye to view specific areas is to deny the human nature and biology itself, which God designed for men to be attracted to females. To deny that pants promote scandal and visual "allurement" of the body is to deny reality.