Vatican II is a legitimate council of the Church called by the Pope in union with all the Bishops, teaching dogmatically, pastorally, and universally from the seat.  We are bound by it's decrees.  Troll is an easy way to dismiss someone posting pro Vatican II.  This is healthy conversation, and there should be this voice on a Catholic forum.

There is doctrinal subject matter promulgated solemnly.  It doesn't matter if Pope Saint John XXIII intended yes or no.  It was ran and closed as a Solemn Ecuмenical Council, called for by a Pope, ran by well trained and highly scholastic Council Fathers (Bishops), who were the living magisterium of the Church.  It is not an abberation, and there is no going back, no need to go back.

Ecclesiological.

It's the wrong question.  The council is replete with doctrine.  A council becomes doctrinal.  The texts become things people can not deny.  If you are asking what are the theses of Vatican II, the closest we have is the Catechism of the Catholic Church.  Every sentence of the counsel, no one can question them.  We are bound.

It's like I hear you asking, give me Ludwig Ott Vatican II.  It is a very difficult task because the council is so big, so wide, fitting for the final council prior to the second coming.

I answered.  I said every sentence.  It's all doctrine now, and it's fine.  There is no contradiction with previous doctrine anywhere in the council.  You can trust cheap fake Benedictine dvds, or the living magisterium.