Why would 6 men need any help [to make a 2000 square foot addition to the priory]?  The parishioners do everything and the prior does not lift a finger (and the six men) and he is complaining?  I wish I had 5 men to help me.

Readers must be astonished that monasteries could've been built in totally unsettled locales [×] by mere monks--and rebuilt--from stone, using mediæval construction technology:
•  as magnificent and eventually huge as Monte Cassino

• or Cluny [@@];

•  as challenging as Citeaux [@@@] or Clairvaux [@@@@@]; or
•  an environment as severe as Chartreuse [@@@@] of the Carthusians.

But wait!  There are important lessons to be learned from Florida cracker-houses about construction that can make the summer subtropical climate tolerable.  That can be creatively combined with the modernish concrete-pad technology that's so well-established in Florida.  Not only is concrete-block technology practically universally available, but Florida also has quarries for coquina-rock near St. Augustine (St. Johns Co.), and for more ordinary stone near Ocala (Marion Co.).

Maybe if SSPX is newly determined to indulge in modernist ‘oecuмenism’,  they should arrange to have their clergy trained in building construction by Habitat for Humanity".

-------
Note ×: "totally unsettled locales" meaning locales completely lacking civilized inhabitants, e.g., wood-workers and stone-workers.

Note @: Cassino survives in modern Italy, in inland Lazio (class. Latium), near where an imaginary coastal perpendicular from W.-coastal Gaeta would cross the Liri (River) approx. 1/4 way N.W. across the peninsula.

Note @@: Cluny (est. 910), in Burgundy.

Note @@@: Abb. St. Robert's Citeaux (est. 1098), in Burgundy.

Note @@@@: St. Bruno (of Cologne)'s Chartreuse (Fr. Alps) (est. 1076) of the Carthusians.

Note @@@@@: St. Bernard's Clairvaux (class. clara vallis: "valley of light") (est. 1115), originally the "Valley of Wormwood".

I think this priest was once the Superior of the then all Africa District and, thanks to his temper, lost it all. 

Perhaps if you read and quoted the rest of the posting you might understand that what the OP wrote has nothing to do with making pretty presentations:
"in fact the presentation is scary, for it appears by his vitriol that the prior has lost it. It is anguishing to see the prior open his mouth from the pulpit every Sunday, with his every word he sinks deeper and deeper into appearing to reveal his real hate of the parishioners for not doing everything he says in EVERY detail.

From your posts, to you, truth is vitriol. As such, you have it pretty bad there, why suffer the anguish, why not find some place else to go.
.
The local NO church are almost guaranteed to have pretty sermons.

From the writers brief postings it is obvious that he does not have the mental wherewithal to read clear English or else he is in denial.

It's plain enough for whoever listens to his sermon (posted earlier), that what you consider vitriol is not vitriol at all to Catholics. Snowflake.

The guy "directing the choir" is a novelty. A lot of novelties were brought forth when the prior came to Sanford; he literally switched everything in the church, where the first station of the cross was was now the last. Where the Blessed Mother statue was, there now was St. Joseph. All untraditional. 

I think it would be pointless to talk to him. In all charity I think what he means is well but without "supervision" of a higher authority he is destructing. 

You can always leave after the gospel, you have no requirement to sit through lengthy sermons anyway.
I know the chapel with the 100$ a plate fundraiser dinners that no one attended. Pretty funny if you know the characters