I don't mind the novus ordo fssp or icksp using a hybrid mass....
...but does anyone but me find it annoying and bordering on fraud that they call it the 1962 missal?
I'm wondering why Paul VI didn't just call his new mass the Rite of 1570.
Calling an altered mass by it's unaltered name doesn't strike any of you as sickening?
Books published list their edition number in the front pages by the publisher information.
No musician out there is claiming his music was written by Mozart.
So, why is the Vatican making significant changes blending the novus ordo happy clappy banjo mass with the 1962 mass and naming it "the 1962 mass"?
Why not call it the 2013 Latin Novus Ordo Mass or the 2013 Motu Proprio of Benedict XVI?
Other than profane and vulgar trickery and deceit, I can't think of another reason.