I wasn't the OP of this thread.  I was just replying to your question.  I will try to make my responses more clear in the future.

I believe the OP was posting in response to Denial from our new priest to Macabees on cor-mariae

Either way, take care and happy veterans day.

I cleared it up.

There's no way I'm removing this thread. People need to know that there are TWO Bishop Adamsons, so they don't end up thinking the wrong thing about the wrong one. They need to put on their reading glasses (go in for a closer look), as it were.

I certainly didn't know that there were 2 Bishop Adamsons until this morning. But thanks to this thread, now I do! If I ever hear someone bring up the one linked in the OP and start talking about this recently ordained priest, now I can correct them.

A forum is about spreading and discussing information, not communist censorship and memory holes!

Matthew

I cleared it up.

There's no way I'm removing this thread. People need to know that there are TWO Bishop Adamsons, so they don't end up thinking the wrong thing about the wrong one. They need to put on their reading glasses (go in for a closer look), as it were.

I certainly didn't know that there were 2 Bishop Adamsons until this morning. But thanks to this thread, now I do! If I ever hear someone bring up the one linked in the OP and start talking about this recently ordained priest, now I can correct them.

A forum is about spreading and discussing information, not communist censorship and memory holes!

Matthew

.
Except that there's NOT two bishop Adamsons.
.
The man in the OP isn't a bishop, he's a disgraced child-molesting priest.  The only thing he has in common with Bishop Adamson is the name "Adamson," which in a country populated by Anglo-German people, isn't a very significant coincidence.
.
Of course, I don't object to people knowing that there's a Rev. Thomas Anderson out there, so that they can keep their kids away from him.  But since you're the admin and have the power, maybe you should throw up a red-text note in the OP clearly stating that the person the OP has linked to is in no way, shape, nor form "confusable" with Bishop Merrill Adamson.
.

.
Except that there's NOT two bishop Adamsons.
.
The man in the OP isn't a bishop, he's a disgraced child-molesting priest.  The only thing he has in common with Bishop Adamson is the name "Adamson," which in a country populated by Anglo-German people, isn't a very significant coincidence.
.
Of course, I don't object to people knowing that there's a Rev. Thomas Anderson out there, so that they can keep their kids away from him.  But since you're the admin and have the power, maybe you should throw up a red-text note in the OP clearly stating that the person the OP has linked to is in no way, shape, nor form "confusable" with Bishop Merrill Adamson.
.

.
It would appear there are 4 clerics under discussion:
Bishop Merrill Adamson
Bishop Merrill Anderson
Rev. Thomas Anderson
Rev. Thomas Adamson
.
With a little more sloppiness maybe we can have 4 more:
Bishop Merrill Andersen
Rev. Thomas Andersen
Bishop Thomas Andersen
Rev. Merrill Andersen
.

Bishop Merrill Adamson, is a thuc line Bishop who was consecreted by Bishop José Urbina Anzar, who was consecrated by José Romon Lopez Gaston, himself a thuc bishop through Bishop Christian Datessen, consecrated conditionally by Archbishop Thuc.

November 14, 2017 - St. Josaphat, Bishop & Martyr
 Double Feast
A Reader Asks: "Why Do Some People Wrongly Think
 That All Traditional Priests Must Come only from the Neo-SSPX?"
From: Joe
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
Why do some people wrongly think that all traditionalist priests must come only from the Neo-SSPX? Fellay and his Neo-SSPX sect have turned traditional Catholicism into vicious thuggery!
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
It is simply the power of propaganda. Fellay and his lieutenant, the Jєωιѕн fundraiser Maximilian Krah, are said to have millions of dollars salted away in a dozen corporations in Fellay's native Switzerland. Now Fellay is spending more of that money on propaganda to maintain his shaky control of the Neo-SSPX against being thrown out in the Neo-SSPX duodecimal elections of July 2018.
One goal of Fellay's propaganda is to make seem as if his own Neo-SSPX is the only traditional game in town -- and Fellay is not even traditional Catholic, but for years has been in cahoots with the Newchurch of the New Order in Newvatican, now headed by the Marxist Newpope Francis-Bergoglio. Both Fellay and Bergoglio are afraid that if it gets out that Fellay's sect is only the tip of the iceberg and that there are thousands of real, traditional Catholic priests and congregations around the world that have nothing to do with either Fellay's half New Order sect or with Bergoglio's full-blown New Order sect, it will compromise their ill-gotten power.

---