Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Question to young ladies  (Read 2366 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Question to young ladies
« Reply #30 on: Yesterday at 06:46:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He can’t have got out much or he would realise most girls 16-18 are on the internet quite often.
    Absolutely!

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #31 on: Yesterday at 09:03:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Am I the only one who thinks it's funny that no "young ladies" have posted yet? :laugh1:
    Because it's the gαyest thread on Cathinfo, ever!


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 10:39:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think marriage under 21 is pretty unwise… with exceptions of course. Under 18 is ridiculous.Not legal in my country. it happened years ago often to preserve family ties (aristocracy) or to counteract high infant mortality, peoples lifespan was in general shorter. I do realise you’re probably joking or deliberately posting rage bait (trying to wind people up as we say in UK) but just in case you’re serious I’ll reply seriously.
    Ideally a women should get married in her prime (17-22). Not only is it prudent for the women it was always done throughout history in every civilisation except for the past 500 so years in protestant areas.

    This isn't rage bait, it is simply facts. Even Aristotle said the ideal marriage age was ~18 for the ladies, even girls in his time getting married around 15.

    Also the age of marriage in most western countries is 14-16 depending on where you live, with the parents consent. So unless you live in worst Korea (south) it's not illegal.

    Lifespan wasn't shorter in the past, it's just that infant death was higher so the average is lower, but you were expected to live past 50 if you survived childhood. Even scripture in the psalm says the life of a man is 70-80 years. 

    So no it's not just the aristocracy, but even commoners got married young (females) because people weren't brainwashed by Jєωιѕн propaganda on women. They understood fallen female nature even if they didn't have Christ. As well as the importance of the male being older and ready to provide.

    I'm really amazed with how so many 'trads' live in modern world just assuming all these propaganda points are true when all the historic and biological evidence says otherwise. It's honestly unreal. Must be a side effect of boomer delusion.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 10:40:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He can’t have got out much or he would realise most girls 16-18 are on the internet quite often.
    They don't go on forums.. Instagram, snapchat and tiktok most likely 

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 10:41:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Answer —25 is a perfect age to marry nowadays. Life was very different in the Middle Ages.
    Human nature has not changed at all since the fall of man. A woman's biology has not changed. Jєωιѕн propaganda has.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 11:27:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm really amazed with how so many 'trads' live in modern world just assuming all these propaganda points are true when all the historic and biological evidence says otherwise. It's honestly unreal. Must be a side effect of boomer delusion.
    Agree.  And the use of incel is just an attack on decency and the sacrament of marriage.  Can’t believe Trads would use this obvious propaganda term.  The brainwashing of society, even Trads, is very successful.  

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1069
    • Reputation: +898/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #36 on: Today at 08:43:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Agree.  And the use of incel is just an attack on decency and the sacrament of marriage.  Can’t believe Trads would use this obvious propaganda term.  The brainwashing of society, even Trads, is very successful. 
    There are about 3 plants on here currently, that stir up the pot, trying to come across as based while slipping in modernist, slow-burn brainwashing.

    Not sure who they think they are foolin'.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #37 on: Today at 10:06:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Alrighty young ladies, I have some questions for y'all. Anonymous so people can speak comfortably.


    Do you want to get married?
    Do you know you if you are called to the marriage life?
    What age do you want to get married?
    Do you think there are many marriageable men in your chapel?
    What % of guys do you find attractive at your chapel?
    Do you like older or younger guys?
    What age gap is too large? Or does it not matter if the man is to your liking?
    Do you expect to be a stay at home wife?
    Are you willing to live in poverty if it means marrying the person you like?
    Do you have a crush on someone?
    How old were you when you first thought/desired to get married?
    How old were you when you had a first crush? (I was about 6/7)
    Are most guys at your chapel in good health? i.e not fat
    Do most guys at your chapels groom themselves? monobrows etc
    Do you have high hopes of finding a suitable spouse?
    What conditions do you have/look for a spouse?

    If there is anything else you want to add feel free to do so.
    What does the Original Poster hope to gain from this information? 


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #38 on: Today at 10:18:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would think that well raised ladies at 18 don't have much internet usage. Your comment at not thinking about marriage until 18 is a sign of modern brainwashing. Ideally a woman should already be married around 17/18, certainly not looking to start getting married at 18... Why it so hard for people to understand that female fertility peaks from 17-22, waiting until 18 to START looking is foolish and not prudent.

    Before someone comments nonsense, getting married later to the right person is better than getting married earlier to the wrong person.
    The physical (biological) peak in a woman's fertility does not necessarily coincide with her psychological readiness for marriage. Unless one sees a woman as merely a physical being, and not as a human being that is a composite of a physical body and an immaterial and immortal soul, that consideration is at least as important as noting physical readiness for procreation. The same can be said for men; many, probably most men, are physically capable of fathering children long before they are psychologically ready for Fatherhood. Is this hard to understand?

    Now, of course, our conversation is taking place in modern Western civilization. If you want to say that men and women should have psychological maturity more commensurate with their biological maturity, I don't disagree. But, it seems to me, that that requires substantially changing the culture. Moreso, it requires changing individuals. That is the fundamental question and problem; are we really willing to change ourselves or should we just continue, like impotent jerks, to blame everyone else for the problem? 



    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #39 on: Today at 10:53:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What does the Original Poster hope to gain from this information?
    A date!

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #40 on: Today at 11:28:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #41 on: Today at 11:35:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What does the Original Poster hope to gain from this information?
    A response from a teenage virgin who will respond that she desires an older man.  Keeps bringing this subject up under various anonymous threads hoping for a different response.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #42 on: Today at 11:56:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0



  • Do you want to get married?
    Do you know you if you are called to the marriage life?
    What age do you want to get married?
    Do you think there are many marriageable men in your chapel?
    What % of guys do you find attractive at your chapel?
    Do you like older or younger guys?
    What age gap is too large? Or does it not matter if the man is to your liking?
    Do you expect to be a stay at home wife?
    Are you willing to live in poverty if it means marrying the person you like?
    Do you have a crush on someone?
    How old were you when you first thought/desired to get married?
    How old were you when you had a first crush? (I was about 6/7)
    Are most guys at your chapel in good health? i.e not fat
    Do most guys at your chapels groom themselves? monobrows etc
    Do you have high hopes of finding a suitable spouse?
    What conditions do you have/look for a spouse?

    If there is anything else you want to add feel free to do so.

    :laugh2::jester::laugh2:

    Offline Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3232
    • Reputation: +1800/-973
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #43 on: Today at 01:03:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The physical (biological) peak in a woman's fertility does not necessarily coincide with her psychological readiness for marriage. Unless one sees a woman as merely a physical being, and not as a human being that is a composite of a physical body and an immaterial and immortal soul, that consideration is at least as important as noting physical readiness for procreation. The same can be said for men; many, probably most men, are physically capable of fathering children long before they are psychologically ready for Fatherhood. Is this hard to understand?

    Now, of course, our conversation is taking place in modern Western civilization. If you want to say that men and women should have psychological maturity more commensurate with their biological maturity, I don't disagree. But, it seems to me, that that requires substantially changing the culture. Moreso, it requires changing individuals. That is the fundamental question and problem; are we really willing to change ourselves or should we just continue, like impotent jerks, to blame everyone else for the problem?
    This^^^
    Fatti Maschii, Parole Femine

    Offline Justinian

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 135
    • Reputation: +58/-49
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Question to young ladies
    « Reply #44 on: Today at 01:14:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The physical (biological) peak in a woman's fertility does not necessarily coincide with her psychological readiness for marriage. Unless one sees a woman as merely a physical being, and not as a human being that is a composite of a physical body and an immaterial and immortal soul, that consideration is at least as important as noting physical readiness for procreation. The same can be said for men; many, probably most men, are physically capable of fathering children long before they are psychologically ready for Fatherhood. Is this hard to understand?

    Now, of course, our conversation is taking place in modern Western civilization. If you want to say that men and women should have psychological maturity more commensurate with their biological maturity, I don't disagree. But, it seems to me, that that requires substantially changing the culture. Moreso, it requires changing individuals. That is the fundamental question and problem; are we really willing to change ourselves or should we just continue, like impotent jerks, to blame everyone else for the problem?
    Absolutely this. Agree entirely.