Pope Francis has ordered a secret sex inquiry into an Italian bishop who has presided over a diocese of 'playboy priests', it has been reported.Pope Francis is the leader of the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Vatican II religion.
Parents have to start taking care of their children and teenagers instead of conveniently turning them over to SSPX and sede priests.Could you help us by explaining what signs of the effeminacy we could look out for. I know somebody personally that has been affected by such situation.
You can forget about the Novus Ordo, any parent who entrusts their children to the Novus Ordo priests is doing so because they are blinded by their own sins.
If a priest shows any sign of effeminacy, they need to be watched very closely.
Could you help us by explaining what signs of the effeminacy we could look out for. I know somebody personally that has been affected by such situation.Effeminacy is something that is easy to spot for those that have eyes to see. Ask a man with an eye to see.
Queers seem to take over lots of places. I wonder how/why. Jєωs are the same way.They take over because this is their time, Satan has given them the power. God is allowing it today because:
Women are not normally good at spotting effeminate men. The men in effeminate European societies like the French, are not going to be good at spotting effeminate men.
True. I could pick out one gαy guy in a crowd of a thousand, but my wife would say, "no, why do you think that?". I was almost always right. But I have since trained her "gαydar" to the point that she can pick them out most of the time too.Give us some hints.
[th] More from PinkNews [/th] | |
[img width=100%]https://www.pinknews.co.uk/images/2018/01/82376b1e61cc6ac1751919e271dd48e5-hugh-obrian-young-hugh-grant.jpg[/img] (https://www.pinknews.co.uk/pagicle/hollywood-stars-who-went-gαy-for-pay-internal/?lv=RC&utm_source=PinkNews&utm_campaign=LFT_gentopimg&utm_medium=general)[/url] | [img width=100%]https://www.pinknews.co.uk/images/2018/01/matilda-1.jpg[/img] (https://www.pinknews.co.uk/pagicle/43-celebrities-you-didnt-know-are-gαy-bisɛҳuąƖ-or-lesbian-internal/?lv=RC&utm_source=PinkNews&utm_campaign=RGT_gentopimg&utm_medium=general)[/url] |
The Straight Stars Who Went gαy For Pay (https://www.pinknews.co.uk/pagicle/hollywood-stars-who-went-gαy-for-pay-internal/?lv=RC&utm_source=PinkNews&utm_campaign=LFT_gentop&utm_medium=general) | Stars You Didn't Know Were gαy Or BisɛҳuąƖ (https://www.pinknews.co.uk/pagicle/43-celebrities-you-didnt-know-are-gαy-bisɛҳuąƖ-or-lesbian-internal/?lv=RC&utm_source=PinkNews&utm_campaign=RGT_gentop&utm_medium=general) |
Give us some hints.
I know that my own gαydar is activated whenever I see a guy dressed in rainbow glittery colors, scrupulously concerned with cleanliness and his appearance and a lover of aftershave and cologne, obsessed with maintaining his collector cars, walking strangely swaying his hips like a girl does, and/or talking in a strange manner with an affected lisp or slur or falsetto.
Can somebody please explain to me how homos develop their mincing, lisping, hyper-feminized style of behaving? I knew a kid from high school who was just a regular guy with none of those affectations- yet a few years latter I ran into him and he was flamboyant and practically flaming. What a change! Is it practiced and purposeful? Does it just creep up on them unknowingly the way a person who moves to the south suddenly finds he has developed a drawl? What? Do they think they are acting feminine? Heck, I don't know of any actual hetero/biological females who have that kind of overly exaggerated demeanor; it's a ridiculous caricature. Do they not realize that it is repellent to people who aren't also deviants? I just don't get it.
Yes, there are the obvious textbook behaviors ... particularly how they move their hips and their wrists. Now, their mode of dress doesn't always clue you in. But their attitude towards their appearance does, as gαys will often show a kind of meticulous attention to minute detail that only women are inclined to by nature and an overall vanity about their appearance. So, for instance, I knew the Society of St. John guys at the Winona seminary (before they left). They absolutely loved wearing lace surplices that went down to their knees and very much resembled dresses. They spent hours ironing their clothes and styling their hair.
But, apart from these overt signs, you can generally tell by their facial expressions ... the way they move their mouth, their lips, and their eyes in particular. Even if all the other signs are absent, I can usually tell from their facial mannerisms.
Normal women don't "lisp" - if they do, it's called a 'speech impediment' and they receive speech therapy. So why to all these sodomites adopt a lisp? Crazy.
I wish I knew where this stuff comes from also. I knew a young man with such behaviors ... who had never been exposed to anything or anyone which would have taught him these behaviors. It was as if it just came natural to him. He ran like a girl, swiveled his hips, had limp wrists, lisped when he spoke ... the works. I do suspect that various environmental factors play a role ... such as the massive increase in environmental estrogens (BPA, other chemicals, etc.). Soy, which is in EVERYTHING these days, also has estrogenic effects. So does higher estrogen and lower testoserone in a young man generate these behavior patterns? Yet not EVERY ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ exhibits these behaviors.I suspect that the physical act of sodomy breaks something inside the person on the receiving end. I read somewhere about a chakra being opened up which makes this painful act, something of an addiction.
I suspect that the physical act of sodomy breaks something inside the person on the receiving end. I read somewhere about a chakra being opened up which makes this painful act, something of an addiction.
The Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky was a manly looking man, and it turned out that he was a predator on boys.
Can somebody please explain to me how homos develop their mincing, lisping, hyper-feminized style of behaving? I knew a kid from high school who was just a regular guy with none of those affectations- yet a few years latter I ran into him and he was flamboyant and practically flaming. What a change! Is it practiced and purposeful? Does it just creep up on them unknowingly the way a person who moves to the south suddenly finds he has developed a drawl? What? Do they think they are acting feminine? Heck, I don't know of any actual hetero/biological females who have that kind of overly exaggerated demeanor; it's a ridiculous caricature. Do they not realize that it is repellent to people who aren't also deviants? I just don't get it.I once attended a large Catholic boarding school and there were about half a dozen queers there (of different ages). When by themselves, they would talk and act quite normally, but when they got together in their little clique (they somehow sought each other out), all the effeminate, queer stuff would take over. In this mode they were so weird and flat-out creepy that we starting calling them "the aliens".
Have you ever seen him during a live interview. Just watch the way his mouth and eyes move when he's talking. Very typical of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.I do not watch television, have never seen him. No loss there, I am sure.
The gist of the article was reported by the newspaper Il Giornale online, January 27, 2006. Rather than deny the accusations, Paul VI had sought the help of his friend Aldo Moro, the president of the Governmental Council, to stop the rumor. This was reported by General Giorgio Manes, who released his confidential notes to l’Espresso as an exclusive. Is there anything sound upon which to base this very serious accusation, or is it just a tabloid splash? The report brings to the surface an unremitting accusation that Paul VI really was a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. It has often been said that the principal thing that could stop the process of his canonization would be that his vice was, and still is, broadly known in countless Italian milieus. In his book, Vatican II, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and Pedophilia (http://www.traditioninaction.org/tiabkHomo.htm), Atila S. Guimarães examined those accusations and, based on credible sources, made the following report. With his permission, I transcribe an excerpt from his work (pages 157 to 162, with the footnotes). He wrote: Accusations against Paul VI It is especially painful to report that the moral integrity of one of the Sovereign Pontiffs was marred by serious reports of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. For Catholics who love and defend the Papacy, the revelation that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity could have penetrated the highest cupola of the Church is particularly sorrowful. Nonetheless, given the credibility of the source and the importance of facing the truth in this grave matter, it seemed a requisite of honesty to offer the following data to the reader to allow him to form his own judgment. In April 1976, an important statement regarding Paul VI was made. In an interview with the Italian magazine Tempo, French author Roger Peyrefitte, a professed ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, commented on a homily (January 1976) in which Paul VI had spoken against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. The French writer alleged that the Pontiff’s words were hypocritical and made this revelation: “The second sin from which I feel I have been freed, after this grotesque papal speech is my ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity …. In my last book, Hunting Scenes, and in another, About the French People, I stated with all the respect due a Pope (especially when he is still alive) that he is ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. It is amazing that the papal speech [against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity] was published at the same time as my book. Was Paul VI moved by a guilt complex? But why should he feel guilty? It is known that a boyfriend of Paul VI was a certain movie star, whose name I will not give, although I remember him very well. He was an unknown actor when our friend Paul was Cardinal Montini, Archbishop of Milan." (1) These grave accusations (which some might consider open to discussion, given the scandalous character of Peyrefitte) were confirmed by another author, a serious professor and journalist who had worked at the Vatican in the papal quarters.
With reliable credentials – professor of Modern History at Innsbruck University (Austria), a correspondent for L’Osservatore Romano, author of two other books on the Vatican, and decorated with the Golden Cross of Merit of the Austrian Republic – he utilized sources and was sure of his facts. In 1994, when his book Nichitaroncalli – Controvita di un Papa (Nikita Krushev and Roncalli – Unknown Aspects of a Pope) was launched in Rome, among those present was Cardinal Silvio Oddi, who came to lend his prestige to the work and to indirectly endorse its contents. In this book Bellegrandi described the situation in the papal quarters: Quote “In Rome and throughout Italy the rumor is out that Paul VI is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ …. When he was Archbishop of Milan, he was caught by the police one night wearing civilian clothes and in not so laudable company. Actually, for many years he has been said to have a special friendship with a red-haired actor. This man did not make any secret of his relationship with the future Pope. The relationship continued and became closer in the years ahead. [After Montini was elected Pope] an official of the Vatican security forces told me that this favorite of Montini was allowed to come and go freely in the pontifical apartments, and that he had often been seen taking the papal elevator at night.Some pages later, Bellegrandi described what he had personally witnessed: Quote “Another change observed by those in that narrow circle who, because of their position in the Hierarchy or their posts, used to pass a large amount of time inside the Apostolic Palace, was the sudden appointment of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs to positions of prestige and responsibility close to the Papacy. This plague infested, transformed, and devastated the Vatican during the time of Paul VI. It had already begun then [in the pontificate of John XXIII], well hidden in the baroque curtain folds of the Pontifical Court, but, unfortunately, alive and real. But it was the distant hand of the Archbishop of Milan, himself a victim of such weaknesses, that discretely placed one after another on the State chessboard …. the pieces of his game dear to his heart.Guimarães ends his chapter by presenting the testimony of Spanish author Pepe Rodrigues, who openly states what would seem to be common knowledge in the inner circles of the European Hierarchy and elites, that there were not only many ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Bishops but also a “great ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Pope.” (4). The former claim, at least, can be affirmed without hesitation in face of the continuing crisis of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity the Church is experiencing because of the involvement or complicity of her Prelates with these crimes. The second claim, if true, would explain in part the immense complacency from the highest cupola regarding ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity among ecclesiastics. Quote 1. Roger Peyrefitte, “Mea culpa? Ma fatemi il santo piacere,” Tempo, April 4, 1976. Posted February 1, 2006 (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) Related Topics of Interest (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and the Clergy (http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02Homo&Clergy.html#dancing) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) Bishop J. Terry Steib - a False Shepherd (http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02oHomoInclined_Steib_NewOxford.shtml) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) The Statistics on ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and its Effects (http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02rStatistcs.html) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) Married Priests and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Seminarians? (http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02liHomo&Clergy_SophismFive_Six.html) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) What about 'Chaste' ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Priests? (http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02qHomo&Clergy_SophismSeven.html) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) The True Colors of Benedict XVI (http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/m007rpRatzingerTrueColors_May05.shtml) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/images/burbtn.gif) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/banners/VatIIREDAd2.gif) (http://www.traditioninaction.org/tiabkHomo.htm) |
I have often wondered about fr. Hewko...Those are some signs. Men who are given into their passions are narcissistic and self-centered. They love to be the center of activity telling stories, jokes, and making funny comments.
Such attention to his lack of hair, always patting boys on the back and holding their shoulders. Are those signs?
Men do not touch boys or other men, if a man is overly friendly with boys, it is a clear signal to watch them, no matter how "manly" they appear.
Is it true that hewko was friends with urritigoity?
The subject of Fr. Hewko is not something that can be handled by internet talk or discussion, it has to be done by those that deal with him on a day to day. Only in day to day contact can people be understood, and not mis-understood.I know that Fr. Hewko would organize Summer camping trips down to say, Florida, and the young men would all go. There's nothing wrong with that, however, a man has to be very careful with that, always bringing along other reputable parents to help watch over things. If Fr. Hewko traveled by himself as the only adult , or he traveled with single male adults as helpers, I would be suspect.
We hope, in the process, the predator doesn't harm someone for life.To paraphrase St. Augustine: Take action as if everything depends on you, and pray very much because everything depends on God.
What the heck is wrong with you people? Voicing suspicion of Fr Hewko being a homo and a perv? Really? If there is no proof, then these public speculations are sinful and calumnious.Where did anyone say Fr. Hewko was a homo or perv? It is only you who mentions it.
True.Not a good sign.
It always struck me as odd that the only "adult" young man on his trips was either a seminarian or young man who went on his trips as a boy.
It also has struck me as odd how he is always so fit. Swimming at the Y, hikes, pushups, running, etc. Is that a sign?Being fit is not "a sign". We should not "read" too much into anything, what we have to do is be there to see him every day, then we can see for ourselves.
Or am I reading into things too much?
It always struck me as odd that the only "adult" young man on his trips was either a seminarian or young man who went on his trips as a boy. I suppose most fathers couldn't take the time off work to chaperone? A mother along would be inappropriate... an older man may not have been able to keep up with the activities?
It also has struck me as odd how he is always so fit. Swimming at the Y, hikes, pushups, running, etc. Is that a sign?
And that hair... a real man would buzz it off, right?
Or am I reading into things too much?
I know that Fr. Hewko would organize Summer camping trips down to say, Florida, and the young men would all go. There's nothing wrong with that, however, a man has to be very careful with that, always bringing along other reputable parents to help watch over things. If Fr. Hewko traveled by himself as the only adult , or he traveled with single male adults as helpers, I would be suspect.I distain Fr. Hewko's association with OLMC, but these comments are way off base. When I was a young teen, I went to his camps, and hikes. There were seminarians, other priests, and parents present. As far back as I can remember, there was never any funny business. I don't believe that Fr.'s fitness has anything to do with his sɛҳuąƖity. Its sad that the people here infer being physically fit with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. Sounds likes justification for the ol' spare tire. There were several boys who grew up and went into the seminary. A couple even became priests. The hikes pushed us hard. It was to teach us that life is challenging, fight are and finish it right. Also he said it was harder to give in to the sins of the flesh when your body is exhausted. As he was the confessor for a bunch of teen boys, it wasn't bad advice.