I have thoroughly refuted your argument.  

I made my argument and then demonstrated that you must establish a valid distinction between the honor owed to parents and the honor owed to wives that would forbid violence against the former while permitting it against the latter.  Honor precludes any violence towards one's parents.  How, then, does honor not do the same for wives?  Burden of proof is on you who advocate violence towards wives.

Oh, stop your tedious BS in pretending that I have not made logical arguments.  I have made them and you have ignored them because you are not capable of making a refutation.  Chances are you don't even understand how to logically approach an argument, what a syllogism looks like, etc.  And yet you pontificate about logic.  Your only argument is a citation from St. Thomas and a moral theology book that you scrounged up somewhere.  In other words, you have a weak argument from authority ... weak because there's no root for it in the Magisterium and also because it's not a universally held opinion.  Consequently, what remains is to discuss the position itself.  And you are clearly incapable of doing so ... while pontificating about logic.

I made my argument and then demonstrated that you must establish a valid distinction between the honor owed to parents and the honor owed to wives that would forbid violence against the former while permitting it against the latter.  Honor precludes any violence towards one's parents.  How, then, does honor not do the same for wives?  Burden of proof is on you who advocate violence towards wives.

If J's husband is like mine, he is standing right besides her telling her exactly what to type. In other words, she is merely his secretary.

I have already responded to your point about honour in an earlier post.  There is nothing logical about ignoring what your opponent has written and then claiming that noone has attempted to refute you.

Most likely.  I'm sorry that your husband treats you like that.  I, for one, value my wife's mind and her opinions ... even when they differ from my own, even if I don't always agree with her on everything.  She's a human being with a mind and will created by God.  I do not own her.  Nor am I interested in controlling her.  There would be nothing interesting to me about having a wife who's been beaten into a mindless replica of myself.  I don't want another copy of myself in my wife.

Also, the logic course I took was given by a seminary. There were too few men studying for priesthood so the opened many of the courses to lay people.  Admittedly it was Novus Ordo, but I think that even they are capable of doing a basic logic course right.