If interacial marriage is a sin then the Spanish who married Indians were wrong and the English who tolerated fornication with Indians but discouraged marriage to Indians were right.
.
Well the fornicators would still be
wrong for fornicating... but good try.
.
That said I think the only legitimate disputation against race mixing happens in the grey areas. Is not race itself just a Marxist construct? The idea of all of us Europeans being "white" is very new. You can go back a few generations and no one believed that, you were whatever your ethnicity was (Irish, German, Polish, etc.). Melding all the Europeans together to create this dichotomy between white and black isn't something we (Europeans) ever voted for, it was foisted on us as the normative way of viewing race relations. Whether it's good or bad for there to be a "white race" I'm not sure, but there's certainly nothing historical or culturally traditional about the idea.
.
That doesn't change the general lack of wisdom in "stark" (i.e., white and black) miscegenation, but it does raise questions about compatability across different European strands. It would seem to follow that a Scotsman would have more in common with a Norweigan or someone from Normandy; on the other hand, a Tuscan is going to be quite a bit further away from an Irishman. Of course that might all not matter anymore since "white people" seem pretty content to be "white people" and have lost most connections to their actual ethnic and cultural heritage.
#s3gt_translate_tooltip_mini { display: none !important; }
Topic: Profound thought on race mixing (Read 3203 times)