Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Problems understanding Akita  (Read 428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Problems understanding Akita
« on: September 07, 2020, 07:18:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If akita did not have any approval - I wouldn't even give it two thoughts :cowboy: but it has been approved 

    She said two things which I wonder about 'if sins increase, there would be no more pardon' - Does that mean the cup of sins is filled and there is no more sacrifice from heaven for sins, (like st Vianney talks about the sins God no longer pardons) 
    or does it mean, if things get so bad, God will intervene (i.e fire falls from the sky)


    She also said the only alms will be your rosary and 'the sign left by my son'
    This correlates with scripture that after the time of tribulation there will be the signs from the heavens of the son of God (it doesn't specify how long these signs in the heavens (the skys) will last. But Isaiah talks about the moon being as bright as the son of the days of coming judgment. 

    If fire falls from the sky killing most of humanity, does that mean there will only be a few alive for the second coming?

    I know I need to focus on the day and be in a state of grace so don't lecture me on this  :incense: :incense: :incense:
    I do live everyday as if it's my last.



    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #1 on: September 07, 2020, 08:26:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Don't concern yourself with Akita, there are too many reasons to disbelieve Akita, that it was from heaven.



    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3475
    • Reputation: +2005/-447
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #2 on: September 07, 2020, 09:56:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I would pay little attention to anything approved by post-Vatican II antipopes.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #3 on: September 07, 2020, 10:19:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would pay little attention to anything approved by post-Vatican II antipopes.
    It is okay to be wary of Akita, though Bishop Williamson believes in it. But do not pay attention to Yeti. He is a outside the Church and has made it his mission to convince the rest of us to leave the Church with him so that we will be damned together. He is just as bad as the modernists even though he may mean well. 

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #4 on: September 07, 2020, 11:21:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If akita did not have any approval - I wouldn't even give it two thoughts :cowboy: but it has been approved
    Approved by whom? The Vatican II church? You might as well believe all the Vatican II popes are saints.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #5 on: September 07, 2020, 11:22:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Approved by whom? The Vatican II church? You might as well believe all the Vatican II popes are saints.
    That was me, Last Tradhican
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #6 on: September 07, 2020, 11:24:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  do not pay attention to Yeti. He is a outside the Church and has made it his mission to convince the rest of us to leave the Church with him so that we will be damned together. He is just as bad as the modernists even though he may mean well.
    Advice from an Anonymous. Totally useless. 
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #7 on: September 07, 2020, 11:33:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Advice from an Anonymous. Totally useless.
    All your posts are useless except if you want to hear an old man talk about how he was the scuм of the earth for all his youth, then converted and became a trad and got married and now he is the only good Catholic on earth and all of the other people he knows at his SSPX chapel are frauds.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #8 on: September 08, 2020, 01:48:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Read the Mystical City of God or/and The Glories of Mary.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #9 on: September 08, 2020, 02:27:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • She also said [...] and 'the sign left by my son'

    I don't believe that Our Lady would brag, calling Our Lord my son.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #10 on: September 08, 2020, 03:49:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't believe that Our Lady would brag, calling Our Lord my son.
    Our Lady of Pontmain, Jan 17, 1871, Pre-Vatican 2 approved apparition
    Quote
    But pray, my children. God will hear you in time. My Son allows Himself to be touched.
    Our Lady of Beauraing, Nov 29, 1932, Pre-Vatican 2 approved apparition
    Quote
    Do you love My Son?


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Problems understanding Akita
    « Reply #11 on: September 08, 2020, 04:14:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Our Lady of Pontmain, Jan 17, 1871, Pre-Vatican 2 approved apparitionOur Lady of Beauraing, Nov 29, 1932, Pre-Vatican 2 approved apparition

    Can you provide a proof that the messages you quoted have been approved by the Church? Not the apparitions, but specifically the messages!