One of my least favorite 'arguments'. 'A non-vote is a vote for hαɾɾιs'.
Kamala supporters say the same thing. 'A non-vote is a vote for Trump.'
Hegel would be proud of the monstrosity he created.
Right ... and it's so bad that when during the 2024 election campaign cycle I criticized Trump, one of the resident Trump-tards here responded to me about "your [meaning my] candidate Trump".
That's the compound fallacy I refer to as "strawman by false dichotomy", where you falsely attribute a position to someone via an implied false dichotomy, where if you don't hold the one position, you must hold the opposite.
Sure ... if I was criticizing Trump for, say, caving on abortion, I'm sure I'm much happier with Kamala's position on abortion, right?
They've using this right now to set up a great persecution of "αnтι-ѕємιтєs". If you recall the programming where the media (and government officials, including Trump) always referred to those protesting against the genocide in Gaza as "Pro Hamas" protestors, and Trump even said that they "support the terrorists". You know where that's going, right? If and when they unleash a huge fαℓѕє fℓαg terror attack blamed on Muslims, then if after that anyone criticizes Israel, they'll be labeled supporters of the terror attacks, and, then, given the heinous nature of what they have planned for us, declare them "enemy combatants", strip them of their citizenship, and send them off to torture prisons in El Salvador (Trump has already talked about doing that, where "bad" Americans (aka anti-Israeli Americans)) should be stripped of their citizenship. At that point, they'll send ICE after us, and send us to El Salvador.