First, I've not known about the priests who are big pedophiles but were publicly very anti-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. Usually, the ones I've heard about were pretty much silent about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. But people putting on a façade to hide their true persona is not unusual.
I would agree that most of the priests and bishops left in the Conciliar sect are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ--at least the ones that are widely known. Everything they say and how they act just screams sɛҳuąƖ perversions. I don't think many of the traditional clergy that are not affiliated with the Conciliar sect, however, are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. There have been one or two whose perversions became public knowledge, and, at least one of them is now a priest in the Conciliar sect.
There are no "conservative" bishops and cardinals in the Conciliar sect. All of them, at least, all of them that are known in public, are wedded to Modernism. Only Conciliarists like Stubborn and poche actually think any of them are "conservatives".
I suppose this is an unfair characterization. If, by "conservative" you mean they want to "conserve the Modernist takeover of the Catholic institutions", then, I suppose, there are a lot of "conservative" bishops and cardinals out there.
Only the SSPX really knows what the SSPX is planning, but it certainly doesn't appear that "saving the Church" is part of that plan.
I don't know what you're talking about in those last two items, so I have no comment.
What should you think? Perhaps you should look at the situation as it truly is rather than what you would like it to be and realize that the Conciliar sect is simply not the Catholic Church.