Author Topic: Paul VI Wikipedia page (Read 3179 times)

Änσnymσus · « **on:** July 26, 2012, 03:48:01 PM »

I'm a user on Wikipedia, and I decided to have some fun with Paul VI's Wikipedia page. Let's see how long my changes last before some Novus Ordite comes along and edits it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_VI

See if you all can notice the changes I made.

One notable change at the beginning of the article that I made:

Quote

It is likely that Paul VI was a Freemasonic infiltrator, who's intent was to destroy the Catholic Church. Some strong evidence of this exists, such as Fr. Villa stating that Padre Pio said Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ "had even entered the shoes of the Pope". Paul VI himself even stated, following the Second Vatican Council, that "the smoke of satan has entered the Church". He is quite possibly the most convtroversial (anti)pope in the history of the Catholic Church.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #1 on:** July 26, 2012, 03:51:21 PM »

For some reason, the link won't come out.

So just go onto Wikipedia and type in "Paul VI" and see the (new and improved) article for yourself.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #2 on:** July 26, 2012, 04:40:44 PM »

I went to the Wikipedia and those progressives already erased and replaced
the entry that needs to be in the Wikipedia on Paul Vl. Those Wikipedia
entrys are closely watched for any change that challenges the official
story.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #3 on:** July 26, 2012, 05:06:04 PM »

This is why it didn't remain:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV

Curiously, Wikipedia NPOV also somehow prevents articles regarding violence against pro-life demonstrators, even though http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence exists. Just look at the debate on that talk page.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #4 on:** July 26, 2012, 05:29:41 PM »

I received the following message in my inbox on Wikipedia:

Quote

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope Paul VI. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #5 on:** July 26, 2012, 05:38:40 PM »

I'm a trad Catholic and I could have told you that your edit didn't sound tactful or fair at all. There's a better way of adding things like this to a Wikipedia article.

Many Novus Ordites who actually know about the trad movement don't take trads seriously at all, so it doesn't help the cause if you make comments laced with anger and vitriol.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #6 on:** July 26, 2012, 05:43:48 PM »

The last poster should not be concerned about being tactful or fair about a satanic Antipope like Paul VI.
Paul VI almost completely deprived us of the Mass, and the priesthood, and the true Faith.
What a satanic Antipope.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #7 on:** July 26, 2012, 05:52:40 PM »

I'd be more convinced of Paul VI's allegiance to Satan if he allowed abortion and contraception.

In any case this is not what Wikipedia is for and you succeeded in making yourself look like an angry fellow with an agenda.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #8 on:** July 26, 2012, 06:06:57 PM »

Quote from: Guest

I'd be more convinced of Paul VI's allegiance to Satan if he allowed abortion and contraception.

In any case this is not what Wikipedia is for and you succeeded in making yourself look like an angry fellow with an agenda.

Oh, so are you the one who erased what I wrote on Wikipedia? :wink:

You're making yourself look a bit liberal.

Listen, I did it for sort of a joke. I don't care if any of the Novus Ordites take me seriously or not. Who cares what they think? I like having a sense of humor. I knew it was going to be erased, but I did it for a laugh. And actually, what I wrote about Paul VI is true. The NO is, as I wrote on Wikipedia, a "Protestant, Freemasonic service", and Paul VI was no doubt a Mason. Read what he said at the United Nations.

Maybe if you weren't so serious you could appreciate what I did and look at it as a good humor.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #9 on:** July 26, 2012, 06:14:36 PM »

Paul Vi is a hero to novus ordo and soon he will be a saint to let further push vatican II because they will never ever admit that they are wrong.

Even after 2009 excommunications were lifted, the hostility of traditional catholics still exist and the clergy keep preaching that SSPX are herectics. They hate all things things traditional and catholic.

http://bloggerpriest.com

catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0072.html

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #10 on:** July 26, 2012, 06:17:13 PM »

Even the most oblique challenges to the Judaic party line is doomed to failure on Wikipedia. I have never been able to get anything to last longer than a few milliseconds. It is a project of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan—period.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #11 on:** July 26, 2012, 06:19:57 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest
I'd be more convinced of Paul VI's allegiance to Satan if he allowed abortion and contraception.

In any case this is not what Wikipedia is for and you succeeded in making yourself look like an angry fellow with an agenda.

Oh, so are you the one who erased what I wrote on Wikipedia? :wink:

You're making yourself look a bit liberal.

Listen, I did it for sort of a joke. I don't care if any of the Novus Ordites take me seriously or not. Who cares what they think? I like having a sense of humor. I knew it was going to be erased, but I did it for a laugh. And actually, what I wrote about Paul VI is true. The NO is, as I wrote on Wikipedia, a "Protestant, Freemasonic service", and Paul VI was no doubt a Mason. Read what he said at the United Nations.

Maybe if you weren't so serious you could appreciate what I did and look at it as a good humor.

I'm not saying that you're wrong, just that you went about it the wrong way if you wanted to keep it there for good. The controversies in the controversies section could use some expansion.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #12 on:** July 26, 2012, 08:07:19 PM »

Quote from: guest

I'm not saying that you're wrong, just that you went about it the wrong way if you wanted to keep it there for good.

I knew it wouldn't stay there for good, that wasn't my intent.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #13 on:** July 27, 2012, 05:05:13 PM »

Maybe Paul VI didn't give the thumb's up to abortion and contraception because he knew that it would up to future generations to bring about those goods.

Although it is curious that it was only after Vatican II that abortion became the law of the land in so many countries...

Perhaps Vatican II really pushed the Holy Ghost away from the Novus Ordo.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #14 on:** July 27, 2012, 10:07:53 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Maybe Paul VI didn't give the thumb's up to abortion and contraception because he knew that it would up to future generations to bring about those goods.

If Paul VI expected future generations to usher in abortion and contraception for him, why did he oppose them in no uncertain terms during his lifetime? In order to advance abortion and contraception, it would have been more effective for him to be silent if not openly support them.

Author Topic: Paul VI Wikipedia page (Read 3179 times)

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus