You always accept whatever view happens to please you. Should I cite top psychologists and behavioral scientists who argue that corporal punishment of wives by husbands have the potential for serious physical and emotional consequences? What would you say to those?
Since I am not a proponent of corporal punishment of wives (however much you try to create the impression that I am) I would have nothing to say about it.
I am getting miffed that you drag this subject in whenever you disagree with me about something. It is not even my actual view and yet you raise the subject again and again. And then people complain about how the subject gets talked about too much. It is not because this forum is filled with men who want to hit women, but because it is your go to "red herring".
More generalizations. Everything depends on WHY they're skipping. I doubt you'll ever find a man who has skipped on PRINCIPLE (because you can count on one hand the people who claim that it's wrong for a husband to be there). So is the man who skips the birth of his child because he's got tickets to a playoff game not a jerk?
That article that I cited from Today's Parent was all about men who were absent from birth on principle. It is not unusual for men to be uncomfortable with being present at birth and that is, in itself, a good reason not to be there. An uncomfortable husband is quite likely not going to do a good job of comforting his wife and they should find someone else to do that job who will do it better.
There is no reason to think that it is common for men to "skip out because they have tickets to a playoff game." You keep promoting all these negative stereotypes about men, apparently so you can show off how superior you are to the usual sort of men. (You never talk about "we men have this problem we ought to correct." It's always "those other men are horrible but not me.") There is already a problem in our society with demonizing men and it is really irresponsible of you to keep throwing fuel on the fire as you do.