If the SSPX thought it necessary to have Rome ratify their General Chapter results, how could they not think it necessary to have the same insane Rome ratify their consecrations?

I've been out of the SSPX loop for quite some time now.  Is that the 2012 General Chapter?  

Why is this nonsense in the Anonymous forum again?

This subforum was created precisely for these types of posts: "Members can post here αnσnумσυѕly for legitimate reasons. For first-hand chapel reports, ωнιѕтlєвlσωιng, sensitive/personal questions, and any other legitimate occasion for αnσnymıty."

Anyone here actually believe this here rumour?

Yes, it seems very plausible.  Bishop Tissier can barely make the rounds, so despite large growth from Novur Ordo covid defections, they are nearly down to 2 bishops.  Very soon they will need more, somehow.

This is not whistleblowing.

It is the textbook definition of whistleblowing: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whistleblower 

They’ve waited 30 years to consecrate new ones… I don’t believe it if I’m being honest.

Anyone here actually believe this here rumour?

Not I.

The rumour is circulating amongst the European priests: 4 bishops to be consecrated within a year's time?

Will they be consecrated with or without the permission of Rome?

If without, how can that be verified? 

If the SSPX thought it necessary to have Rome ratify their General Chapter results, how could they not think it necessary to have the same insane Rome ratify their consecrations?

If I had to guess, and if this rumor is indeed true (or has any elements of truth to it, such as consecrating one or two more bishops instead of four, or having a new-rite bishop such as Schneider or Huonder to join in the consecration), the SSPX may be waiting until Francis leaves the papacy, and waiting to see who the next Pope will be, and how favorably disposed he is to both the SSPX and the TLM in general.  If it were Erdo, things might be okay.  If it were Tagle, things might not be okay.

They may want to see if it's going to be a worst-case scenario, and if they might have to press ahead and incur excommunication for consecrating a bishop without a papal mandate, IOW, 1988 all over again.  (But I do have to wonder if Tagle, as "Pope John XXIV", would be as bold as to declare excommunication and schism, and strictly to enforce TC and that despicable "in due time" coda, with hundreds of thousands of screaming traditionalists of all stripes and a very, very vocal Web presence.  We didn't have that in 1988, when it was basically The Angelus and Radko Jansky's Mass directory and that was about it.)