Maizar said: The facts you put forth are true except you omit who the financiers of Hitler were (UBC / Bush / Fritz Thyssen). It then becomes clear that he was from the outset intended as a tool to be used for the subjugation and enslavement of Germans, and the expulsion of Catholicism and any other potential anti-masonic / anti-Jєωιѕн force, but it appears he went rogue and became an unexpected menace to world Jєωry. Hence he is made out to be the most evil, because they trusted him and even supported him, yet he set about to destroy their power structures.
How was he in any way a menace to world Jєωry? The Jєωs do not fund someone that's going to somehow go against their bidding, do you think the devil is that stupid? I would say that is to severely underestimate your opponent.
Whatever happened during World War II, they wanted someone like Hitler to create a furor about Jєωs, because their goal was to create an excuse for themselves to take over Israel. They needed a boogeyman who appeared to be, or really was, chasing them out of Europe. So even if his intentions were truly to destroy the Jєωs, they wanted that, they let him through as part of their long-range plan.
People who expect Anti-Christ to be another form of JPII may be very surprised... To find he is more like Hitler. He may even pose as someone who is a conquering hero out to STOP liberalism in the Church; then telling people to stop going to Mass and follow him alone. What the devil wants is for people to swing from one extreme to the other, from liberalism to Pharisaism.
Those who see through the lies will refuse to go "left" or "right" and will study the saints, and will think like Catholics have always thought. We shouldn't even use language like "left" or "right" because those words can mean whatever we want them to mean. Just as economic liberalism and ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic warmongering are now considered "right-wing."