Author Topic: nαzι sympathizers (Read 1927 times)

Graehame · « **on:** March 31, 2012, 10:55:19 PM »

Quote from: Guest

There I said it. If Hitler was alive today I would march behind him and help him crush the yids.

That's an extreme view, don't you think? And Hitler didn't just "crush the yids", as you put it-- he was especially hostile towards the Catholic Church. Members of the SS who were Christian came under tremendous pressure to recant their Christian beliefs, & many Catholics found themselves in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs alongside "the yids".

That said, I too am not a big fan of Jєωs. I used to be. I used to think that we all worshipped the same God & we were all on the same page. That was before I got screwed over-- really bad & 3 times in succession-- by my so-called Jєωιѕн friends. 3 different ones. These days I'm a lot more circuмspect about the whole Jєωιѕн thing.

...but that said, I don't think I'd happily go along with killing 6 million of 'em, either. Especially if the killing included members of my own faith.

Maizar · « **Reply #1 on:** March 31, 2012, 11:15:51 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest
There I said it. If Hitler was alive today I would march behind him and help him crush the yids.

And I would come and take possession of your property after you played into my hands. :)

Exactly. All this modern Jєω hatred comes from the Jєωs themselves who can only understand the world in terms of fear and hate and so project the same emotions on their enemies (everybody else).

Matthew · « **Reply #2 on:** April 01, 2012, 12:41:43 AM »

Quote from: Graehame

Quote from: Guest
There I said it. If Hitler was alive today I would march behind him and help him crush the yids.

That's an extreme view, don't you think? And Hitler didn't just "crush the yids", as you put it-- he was especially hostile towards the Catholic Church. Members of the SS who were Christian came under tremendous pressure to recant their Christian beliefs, & many Catholics found themselves in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs alongside "the yids".

That said, I too am not a big fan of Jєωs. I used to be. I used to think that we all worshipped the same God & we were all on the same page. That was before I got screwed over-- really bad & 3 times in succession-- by my so-called Jєωιѕн friends. 3 different ones. These days I'm a lot more circuмspect about the whole Jєωιѕн thing.

...but that said, I don't think I'd happily go along with killing 6 million of 'em, either. Especially if the killing included members of my own faith.

I agree, except I don't believe the whole "six million Jєωs killed in gas chambers" h0Ɩ0cαųst (tm) nonsense.

The h0Ɩ0cαųst is a bunch of ... what comes from the south end of north-bound cattle.

But Hitler tried to bring Germany back to its pagan days -- smashing the Catholic Church first, of course. How can a Catholic back Hitler, EVEN IF he is against obvious nonsense like the h0Ɩ0cαųst lie?

Maizar · « **Reply #3 on:** April 01, 2012, 04:01:12 AM »

Quote from: Guest

I too sympathize with the Axis, rather than the Allies, if only Hitler had remained true to the Faith of his baptism, perhaps it would have pleased Our Lord to use Germany to crush Judaeo-Masonry. The various national movements of the 1920's & 30's were a last desperate effort to break the death-grip of International Jєωry. I've often thought on the possibility of Hitler's being somehow incapacitated & drugged, or else being an agent of Jєωry from the beginning, in light of some the decisions he made during the war. He was an intelligent man, yet he would not order an immediate invasion of Britain in 1940, when a German victory would have been swift & sure. Why not? Instead of pushing on to the Kremlin, & also seizing the oil fields in the Caucasus, he became fixated with taking Stalingrad, which in the end resulted in Germany's defeat. Once again, why? On a brighter note, at least General Franco & Dr. Salazar kept the Iberian peninsula free of Judaeo-Masonic domination for a few decades. If only this had been true for the entire world, & for more than a few decades.

The facts you put forth are true except you omit who the financiers of Hitler were (UBC / Bush / Fritz Thyssen). It then becomes clear that he was from the outset intended as a tool to be used for the subjugation and enslavement of Germans, and the expulsion of Catholicism and any other potential anti-masonic / anti-Jєωιѕн force, but it appears he went rogue and became an unexpected menace to world Jєωry. Hence he is made out to be the most evil, because they trusted him and even supported him, yet he set about to destroy their power structures.

Hitler also probably saved Western Europe by sacrificing himself and Germany to stop a complete overrun by Stalin, no thanks to the British who refused to negotiate peace at every turn. This is why Hitler went for Moscow. He knew he was going to lose.

I rather think, "if only" Russians had not supported any revolution against their monarchy, nor allowed the dissolution of their parliament, thus avoiding the deaths of tens of millions of devout Christians, "if only" someone internally had come along and popped off a few important bankers of the day, perhaps those then things might have taken a very different turn.

Jitpring · « **Reply #4 on:** April 01, 2012, 12:50:06 PM »

Quote from: Guest

I sympathize with nαzιs.

There I said it. If Hitler was alive today I would march behind him and help him crush the yids.

Disgusting.

John Grace · « **Reply #5 on:** April 01, 2012, 01:11:16 PM »

Hitler lost the faith. He was elected by the people.We can't forget that. He was a brilliant artist and architect.His version of church was protestant.

John Grace · « **Reply #6 on:** April 01, 2012, 01:15:14 PM »

A good book to read is Truth for Germany The Guilt Question of the Second World War by Udo Walendy or 'Forged War Crimes malign the German Nation' also by Udo Walendy. Robert Faurisson: 'Pope Pius XII's revisionism' is also a book to read.

alaric · « **Reply #7 on:** April 01, 2012, 04:19:01 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Matthew

I agree, except I don't believe the whole "six million Jєωs killed in gas chambers" h0Ɩ0cαųst (tm) nonsense.

The h0Ɩ0cαųst is a bunch of ... what comes from the south end of north-bound cattle.

But Hitler tried to bring Germany back to its pagan days -- smashing the Catholic Church first, of course. How can a Catholic back Hitler, EVEN IF he is against obvious nonsense like the h0Ɩ0cαųst lie?

Your posts recently are getting more and more ignorant (like your blatant Americanism). Smashing the Catholic Church? Bringing back Germany to paganism? How many Jєωιѕн books did you read to come up with that libel? Himmler was the pagan, not Hitler. Hitler REBUKED Himmler and his followers for the pagan revival. I don't say that Hitler was a saint, but he clearly was a Christian. He never smashed the Catholic Church. There were Catholic priests who had relationships with him, like Fr. Krunoslav Draganovic and Bp. Alois Hudal. There were more than 50 Catholic priests in the nαzι party. Some of the anti-Christian nαzιs disliked Hitler for being Catholic and refused to print some works of his priestly friends which Hitler ordered to be printed.

Stop reading Jєωιѕн books! If a Jєω opens his mouth, he's lying.

Well from what I've read (And no not by just "Jєωs" BTW) Hitler tolerated Himmler and the pagans because of their loyalty to him and the Reich but personally believed they were more or less total kooks. He began to believe this was true of most religions as well as time went on.

People have this idea that Hitler was some kind of mystic, mesmerized by some kind of esoteric Christian or Pagan thought, that's all a bunch of Judaic or anti NS lies. Hitler at the end of the day was more of a skeptic than anything and from he seen as time went on from "christians", Pagans and Jєωs, can you blame him?

The thing is, we're never really going to get any real truth about what Hitler really believed because of all the slander, hyperbole and outright lies written about him and downright paranoia associated with it.

Nishant · « **Reply #8 on:** April 01, 2012, 05:20:55 PM »

His Holiness Pope Pius XII, while yet Cardinal Pacelli, observed that the nαzιs "are in reality only miserable plagiarists who dress up old errors with new tinsel. It does not make any difference whether they flock to the banners of social revolution, whether they are guided by a false concept of the world and of life, or whether they are possessed by the superstition of a race and blood cult." Nuff' said.

Roland Deschain · « **Reply #9 on:** April 01, 2012, 06:51:18 PM »

Quote from: Jitpring

Quote from: Guest
I sympathize with nαzιs.

There I said it. If Hitler was alive today I would march behind him and help him crush the yids.

Disgusting.

Yup. This sounds like the kind of garbage a troll would come here and post in order to try to paint traditionalists a certain way.

Matthew · « **Reply #10 on:** April 01, 2012, 08:49:46 PM »

To Mr. 71.190.7.227,

You've been IP-banned, and all your pro-Hitler propaganda deleted.

I may not know who you are, but I can still moderate your ignorant blatherings.

Speaking of which, YOU are the ignorant one, and apparently don't know me very well -- even if we limit the field to "what one could learn by reading my posts".

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. Go back to grade school.

Matthew · « **Reply #11 on:** April 01, 2012, 08:51:52 PM »

Oh, and I didn't spend a lot of time deleting your posts, either.

I just did a search for all posts with IP "71.190.7.227" and deleted them all in one fell swoop.

I can do it again, too. And again, and again.

So get lost and stay lost, you Jєωιѕн tool.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #12 on:** April 02, 2012, 10:11:17 PM »

Maizar said:

Quote

The facts you put forth are true except you omit who the financiers of Hitler were (UBC / Bush / Fritz Thyssen). It then becomes clear that he was from the outset intended as a tool to be used for the subjugation and enslavement of Germans, and the expulsion of Catholicism and any other potential anti-masonic / anti-Jєωιѕн force, but it appears he went rogue and became an unexpected menace to world Jєωry. Hence he is made out to be the most evil, because they trusted him and even supported him, yet he set about to destroy their power structures.

How was he in any way a menace to world Jєωry? The Jєωs do not fund someone that's going to somehow go against their bidding, do you think the devil is that stupid? I would say that is to severely underestimate your opponent.

Whatever happened during World War II, they wanted someone like Hitler to create a furor about Jєωs, because their goal was to create an excuse for themselves to take over Israel. They needed a boogeyman who appeared to be, or really was, chasing them out of Europe. So even if his intentions were truly to destroy the Jєωs, they wanted that, they let him through as part of their long-range plan.

People who expect Anti-Christ to be another form of JPII may be very surprised... To find he is more like Hitler. He may even pose as someone who is a conquering hero out to STOP liberalism in the Church; then telling people to stop going to Mass and follow him alone. What the devil wants is for people to swing from one extreme to the other, from liberalism to Pharisaism.

Those who see through the lies will refuse to go "left" or "right" and will study the saints, and will think like Catholics have always thought. We shouldn't even use language like "left" or "right" because those words can mean whatever we want them to mean. Just as economic liberalism and ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic warmongering are now considered "right-wing."

Maizar · « **Reply #13 on:** April 02, 2012, 10:58:26 PM »

Quote

How was he in any way a menace to world Jєωry? The Jєωs do not fund someone that's going to somehow go against their bidding, do you think the devil is that stupid? I would say that is to severely underestimate your opponent.

This depends on your point of view. He was declared a menace and then they declared war on him, having come to the realization that he was not going to behave as they had hoped, so they chose Churchill to carry out their Zionist agenda instead (and I assume this is why Churchill was not allowed to negotiate for peace with Germany). Hitler was supposed to provide them with an Israel, and this was indeed a part of his policy, but the bankers had their bets hedged well in advance and would get their Israel one way or another.

I don't however assume that the Jєωs are super-intelligent or incapable of making rookie errors, and although historians don't harp on about this point, I think they botched it up with Hitler and had to do a whole lot of fake crime scenery and forgery to make it all work out in their favor after they took Germany. The truth of their activity in nαzι Germany is not very flattering to them to say the least!

John Grace · « **Reply #14 on:** April 07, 2012, 04:32:41 AM »

A good example is how the 'pro-life movement' will use a comparison and try have us believe the nαzι's were all bad. This is from a Youth Defence leaflet. I have no doubt they are well intentioned but what is the lie these 'propagandists' told often enough that it became 'truth'? It's lamentable for them that these pro-lifers use these comparisons. I find Youth Defence an effective organisation but remarkably ignorant regarding historical truth.The fact one would distribute such a leaflet speaks volumes. It's an insult to the German people and an attack on memory of great men like Leon Degrelle and all who fought and died fighting against Jєωιѕн Bolshevism.

http://www.youthdefence.ie/am_cms_media/set-the-record-straight-leaflet.pdf

Quote

The abortion industry is deliberately causing confusion. They're trying to
terrify women and bully the Irish people. They’re following the line of nαzι
propagandists who claimed that “a lie told often enough becomes the truth”.
But this lie - that a life-saving medical treatment is the same thing as an
abortion - is also causing huge hurt and distress to mothers who have lost
children.