Author Topic: nαzι sympathizers (Read 7842 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #10 on:** April 01, 2012, 08:49:46 PM »

To Mr. 71.190.7.227,

You've been IP-banned, and all your pro-Hitler propaganda deleted.

I may not know who you are, but I can still moderate your ignorant blatherings.

Speaking of which, YOU are the ignorant one, and apparently don't know me very well -- even if we limit the field to "what one could learn by reading my posts".

Your reading comprehension is atrocious. Go back to grade school.

Matthew · « **Reply #11 on:** April 01, 2012, 08:51:52 PM »

Oh, and I didn't spend a lot of time deleting your posts, either.

I just did a search for all posts with IP "71.190.7.227" and deleted them all in one fell swoop.

I can do it again, too. And again, and again.

So get lost and stay lost, you Jєωιѕн tool.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #12 on:** April 02, 2012, 10:11:17 PM »

Maizar said:

Quote

The facts you put forth are true except you omit who the financiers of Hitler were (UBC / Bush / Fritz Thyssen). It then becomes clear that he was from the outset intended as a tool to be used for the subjugation and enslavement of Germans, and the expulsion of Catholicism and any other potential anti-masonic / anti-Jєωιѕн force, but it appears he went rogue and became an unexpected menace to world Jewry. Hence he is made out to be the most evil, because they trusted him and even supported him, yet he set about to destroy their power structures.

How was he in any way a menace to world Jewry? The Jews do not fund someone that's going to somehow go against their bidding, do you think the devil is that stupid? I would say that is to severely underestimate your opponent.

Whatever happened during World War II, they wanted someone like Hitler to create a furor about Jews, because their goal was to create an excuse for themselves to take over Israel. They needed a boogeyman who appeared to be, or really was, chasing them out of Europe. So even if his intentions were truly to destroy the Jews, they wanted that, they let him through as part of their long-range plan.

People who expect Anti-Christ to be another form of JPII may be very surprised... To find he is more like Hitler. He may even pose as someone who is a conquering hero out to STOP liberalism in the Church; then telling people to stop going to Mass and follow him alone. What the devil wants is for people to swing from one extreme to the other, from liberalism to Pharisaism.

Those who see through the lies will refuse to go "left" or "right" and will study the saints, and will think like Catholics have always thought. We shouldn't even use language like "left" or "right" because those words can mean whatever we want them to mean. Just as economic liberalism and ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic warmongering are now considered "right-wing."

Maizar · « **Reply #13 on:** April 02, 2012, 10:58:26 PM »

Quote

How was he in any way a menace to world Jewry? The Jews do not fund someone that's going to somehow go against their bidding, do you think the devil is that stupid? I would say that is to severely underestimate your opponent.

This depends on your point of view. He was declared a menace and then they declared war on him, having come to the realization that he was not going to behave as they had hoped, so they chose Churchill to carry out their Zionist agenda instead (and I assume this is why Churchill was not allowed to negotiate for peace with Germany). Hitler was supposed to provide them with an Israel, and this was indeed a part of his policy, but the bankers had their bets hedged well in advance and would get their Israel one way or another.

I don't however assume that the Jews are super-intelligent or incapable of making rookie errors, and although historians don't harp on about this point, I think they botched it up with Hitler and had to do a whole lot of fake crime scenery and forgery to make it all work out in their favor after they took Germany. The truth of their activity in nαzι Germany is not very flattering to them to say the least!

John Grace · « **Reply #14 on:** April 07, 2012, 04:32:41 AM »

A good example is how the 'pro-life movement' will use a comparison and try have us believe the nαzι's were all bad. This is from a Youth Defence leaflet. I have no doubt they are well intentioned but what is the lie these 'propagandists' told often enough that it became 'truth'? It's lamentable for them that these pro-lifers use these comparisons. I find Youth Defence an effective organisation but remarkably ignorant regarding historical truth.The fact one would distribute such a leaflet speaks volumes. It's an insult to the German people and an attack on memory of great men like Leon Degrelle and all who fought and died fighting against Jєωιѕн Bolshevism.

http://www.youthdefence.ie/am_cms_media/set-the-record-straight-leaflet.pdf

Quote

The abortion industry is deliberately causing confusion. They're trying to
terrify women and bully the Irish people. They’re following the line of nαzι
propagandists who claimed that “a lie told often enough becomes the truth”.
But this lie - that a life-saving medical treatment is the same thing as an
abortion - is also causing huge hurt and distress to mothers who have lost
children.