Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes  (Read 17030 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2018, 01:07:48 PM »
St John Vianney had 2 books, Bible and the Mystical city of God. Nothing is wrong with the Mystical City of God, when it comes to Faith, Morals.  Highly Recommended reading!  

Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2018, 08:03:04 PM »
Quote
But in Saint Luke's Gospel (1:34), the Mother of God said to the Angel Gabriel after the Annunciation, "How shall this be done, because I know not man?" This shows that she did not know everything.
From the OP.

The expression "I know not man" means I am a virgin. IT is not a matter of knowlege in the sense acquired information. Surely, as a priest, the writer would be aware of this use of language.


Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2018, 09:46:25 PM »
I admit to not reading the OP and only skimming this thread, but reading the post just above mine, I must say that whomever Nadir quoted should rightly have their credibility called into question.  :facepalm:

-MaterD

Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2018, 10:35:33 PM »
I agree. The Mystical City of God is the most important reading behind the Holy Bible and the Trent Catechism.

I forgot to check "not anonymous"

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2018, 10:44:09 PM »
From the OP.

The expression "I know not man" means I am a virgin. IT is not a matter of knowlege in the sense acquired information. Surely, as a priest, the writer would be aware of this use of language.

Looks like Tradidi (from whence the OP was taken) has become aware of this thread, and made this response to Nadir:
"Nadir’s error is to assume that the author was referring to “because I know not man” when he concluded that “she [Our Lady] did not know everything”. However, that assumption is wrong. The author of this article (Fr. Jean-Luc Lafitte) was referring to the fact that Our Lady answered “How shall this be done” to the Angel Gabriel. In other words, Our Lady did not know how the Incarnation was to be done. This clearly disproves Maria Valtorta’s claim that Our Lady had infused knowledge."
https://forum.tradidi.com/t/correction-for-nadir-on-cathinfo/265