Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10

Author Topic: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes  (Read 17029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2018, 11:31:57 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on December 29, 2018, 11:08:25 PM
1) She confounded Agreda's "Mystical City of God" with Valtorta's "Poem of the Man-God;"
Nadir didn't say which book the quote was referring to. The OP covered more than one.
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2018, 11:38:46 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on December 29, 2018, 11:31:57 PM
Nadir didn't say which book the quote was referring to. The OP covered more than one.
It doesn't really matter:
If Nadir was trying to defend the Mystical City of God, she unwittingly attempted to do so by coming to the rescue of the wrong quote from the wrong book.
If Nadir was trying to defend The Poem of the Man-God, she rebutted the wrong part of the quote which Fr. Lafitte disproved.
Logged

Offline Nadir

Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2018, 12:28:25 AM »
Quote from: Nadir on December 29, 2018, 08:03:04 PM

The expression "I know not man" means I am a virgin. IT is not a matter of knowlege in the sense acquired information. Surely, as a priest, the writer would be aware of this use of language.
Please read what I wrote.
I refer to NOTHING but the quote from this priest who should know the Biblical meaning of the word to know, which is to have intimate (sɛҳuąƖ) relations.
I have read none of the books named in the OP, except for snippets of MV. 
I have very little interest in private revelation. I am not against it. I have no interest in promoting any of these writers though from what I have read here, if I were to choose to read any it would be Agreda.
THanks for your interest though :popcorn:
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #23 on: December 30, 2018, 06:29:50 AM »
Quote from: Nadir on December 30, 2018, 12:28:25 AM
Please read what I wrote.
I refer to NOTHING but the quote from this priest who should know the Biblical meaning of the word to know, which is to have intimate (sɛҳuąƖ) relations.
I have read none of the books named in the OP, except for snippets of MV.
I have very little interest in private revelation. I am not against it. I have no interest in promoting any of these writers though from what I have read here, if I were to choose to read any it would be Agreda.
THanks for your interest though :popcorn:
That you persist in imagining Fr. Lafitte made any kind of comment at all regarding “I know not man” shows you still do not have understand what you are reading.
You should really keep quiet.
His comment disproving Valtorta’s claim that Mary had infused knowledge from the age of three is based on the former’s  “how can this be,” not the “since I know not man” as you ignorantly pretend.
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Mystical City of God: Burned and Condemned by Popes
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2018, 02:28:25 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on December 30, 2018, 06:29:50 AM
That you persist in imagining Fr. Lafitte made any kind of comment at all regarding “I know not man” shows you still do not have understand what you are reading.
You should really keep quiet.
His comment disproving Valtorta’s claim that Mary had infused knowledge from the age of three is based on the former’s  “how can this be,” not the “since I know not man” as you ignorantly pretend.
Here is the whole paragraph:

This is lifted straight from the OP. 
.
I persist in imagining? There is plenty of imagination in some of the anonymous posters here, accusing me of thinking/saying/inferring things I have not said, but none in what I have written. 
.   
The last two sentences can and do give the impression that "she did not know everything" refers to its immediate precedent, no? 
.
Thank you for your gentle correction.
.
I am just amazed that so many people among the anonymous can take offence (and be offensive), at such a simple and insignificant comment. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
« previous next »