How much more proof will some people need to realize that Mr. Wiest is NOT a priest & shouldn't be called Fr.? or "Fr."
What has been posted so far is certainly enough to raise serious questions about Wiest, but it is far from definitive proof.
In all the time that has been spent on this have any of you looked further into his background? His family? Contacted any of them to ask for details? A little searching on the ol' interwebs brought up several family connections to persue. It seems the
least you could do if your going to keep pushing this.
As long as were at it I have to ask, do you ever ask yourself "what if I'm wrong about this"?
It's a slap in the face to true priests so stop it.
Hardly.