Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: More weirdness from “Fr.” Michael Wiest at OLHC  (Read 69561 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: More weirdness from “Fr.” Michael Wiest at OLHC
« Reply #195 on: November 18, 2021, 02:04:17 PM »
Thank you for your balanced comment regarding OLHC and the Fr’s there.

I have never been to this church, nor do I know any parishioners or the priests there. I have been following this story hoping it would pan out at some point, but some of the comments have been extremely vicious in nature, and many of the posts left a bad taste, so I found myself actually rooting for the underdogs.

Honestly, if there had been even an ounce of charity in those who were posting their concerns about such things, there would be a lot more sympathy from others here.
Sadly, those anonymous ones who are lacking that Catholic prudence and charity have shown that even after correction of their error, they refuse to learn, so this post will also fall on their deaf ears too.

It is a tragedy Fr Perez was sick and now has passed away while this train wreck was going on over here. We can only hope it ends here and now.
I sincerely pray that Fr Wiest has received the Last Sacraments and is on his way to recovery so he can have the chance to clear his name. Whether he chooses to or not is up to him, but while he is ill, and could be on deaths door, we all need to leave this alone.
The people of this church have already lost Mass for a period of time. I hope they have an alternative chapel to get the Sacraments. 
Thank you, I think that of all the posts on this subject that this is the best by far!

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: More weirdness from “Fr.” Michael Wiest at OLHC
« Reply #196 on: November 18, 2021, 02:37:17 PM »
..  Fr. Perez didn't want the rectory to be near the church - which is where it usually is & should be - & so he bought a large house for himself in another town several miles from the church!!

The moral of this story is --  don't blame the School board for the mess at the church.  That was Fr. Perez's job & responsibility & he was too busy with worldly things to bother with it. 
Um no, Fr. Perez never "bought a large house for himself." Father Perez lived in a trailer park for many years until his parents needed assistance. At that time he moved back to their family home to help both of them with their health problems. When one parent passed away and the other parent went up north to stay with Fr. Perez's sister, Fr. Perez stayed in his family home. Fr. Perez has repeatedly failed to vet priests who some to OLHC (pederast Colletti, Pfiefferville pseudo-priest, and now Mr. Wiest who refuses to show ordination papers.) But let's not make false charges against him.


Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: More weirdness from “Fr.” Michael Wiest at OLHC
« Reply #197 on: November 18, 2021, 03:03:22 PM »
Fr. Perez has repeatedly failed to vet priests who some to OLHC (pederast Colletti, Pfiefferville pseudo-priest, and now Mr. Wiest who refuses to show ordination papers.) But let's not make false charges against him.
The guy just died. Get on your broom and head back to your coven.

Ipse Venena Bibas

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: More weirdness from “Fr.” Michael Wiest at OLHC
« Reply #198 on: November 18, 2021, 05:09:07 PM »
I checked the Deed to the house shortly after it was purchased & Fr. Perez's name & his parents names were on the Deed.  Now whether the parents paid the cash for it & Fr. paid nothing, the fact remains that his name is on the house & he wanted to live away from the church.  That was my main point.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: More weirdness from “Fr.” Michael Wiest at OLHC
« Reply #199 on: November 18, 2021, 05:36:55 PM »
Anon 2:37 where on earth did you get all that wrong info?!  Fr. Perez did live in a trailer park but did NOT move back to the family home as the family lived in San Jose!  His father passed away in San Jose & the mother & sister still live there.  Sentence 3 & 4 are completely wrong, as is the end part of the second sentence!!!!  Unbelievable.