It is in no way acceptable by anyone who even pretends to be Catholic. And I am not posting anonymously.
Says the guy who called St. John Chrysostom an "αnтι-ѕємιтє" and boasted of having a "gαy friend." You'd know about people "pretending to be Catholic" if anyone would, Siggy.
But for the edification of anyone interested in making important distinctions: the word "nigger" refers to a person (or persons). The term "ghetto nig-noggery" on the other hand, refers to a pattern of behavior exhibited by persons living down to the very worst stereotypes surrounding the group to whom the word "nigger" is usually applied. Anyone familiar with "Father" Pfleger's theatrical minstrel-show antics and race-pimp thuggery will know that he, indeed, lives down to those worst stereotypes and promotes the same (and also happens to be, wouldn't you know it, every bit as lily-white as you, Siggy).So you can put down your direct hotline to the Charity Police, because A. I didn't use the dreaded "N-WORD" and B. it's not possible to sin against charity by disparaging a pattern of behavior.
Even if your criticisms of me ore 100%correct, you are still a racist idiot and an embarrassment to your own cause.
My criticism of you is merely this: that you've allowed your intellect and the judgments that flow thence to become so fundamentally influenced by modern mores and "values" over and against real Catholic traditions and teachings that you actually accused the greatest of the Church's Eastern Fathers of the wholly modern, wholly invented "sin" of "anti-Semitism." One can't put too fine a point on that -
You judged one of the greatest Catholic saints according to the standards of the godless modern world, when it is the duty of every Catholic to do the opposite. So your accusing me of being a "racist" or an "idiot" or whatever else, while it pales into utter insignificance by comparison to that aforementioned blasphemy, can hardly be taken seriously considering the source.
But just so the record's clear - I hold no belief whatsoever in the inherent overall superiority of one race over another, and I challenge you to provide a quotation of mine to prove otherwise. And, no, Siggy, an isolated use of a feather-ruffling epithet to describe a pattern of behavior does not make me a "racist" any more than an isolated use of the word "rendezvous" makes me a Frenchman, no matter how much you might wish it were so.
As to your charge that I'm an "idiot," I refer you to Our Lord's admonition in S. Matthew v:xxii.
But speaking of embarrassments and "racist idiots," - didn't you quit this forum back when you formally anathematized Matthew as a "racist," and therefore (again, according to you) no longer a member of the Catholic Church? Why are you still here, then? Are you also in the habit of eating in restaurants that serve terrible food and then complaining that the portions are too small?