I would also add, that there's a place for a Jordan Peterson. What I mean is this: If Bishop Williamson gets up there and gives us the whole truth, most people (college kids, etc.) will tune out for various reasons: He's a Catholic, he's a Traditional Catholic, a "h0Ɩ0cαųst denier", and so forth.
But a Jordan Peterson can get people moving in the right direction, get them thinking the right way, and he's closer to where they are. He's more accessible, as it were.
Just like Fr. Goettler (SSPX priest) once said in a sermon: the Indult is GREAT "on the way up" to the fullness of Tradition. But it's relatively speaking a sellout, compromised, inferior, bad position if you're "on the way down" from a more complete package of Tradition (Today that would mean some SSPX, Resistance, sedevacantist, independent Tridentine Mass chapel, etc.)
That's why it's a tragedy what's happening to the SSPX -- they had the full package, and are STEPPING DOWN to becoming FSSP.
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that the SSPX had 100,000 faithful. Now if 100,000 Novus Ordo Catholics become FSSP, that would be a GREAT THING. But a horrible tragedy if those 100,000 people were +ABL position, Recognize and Resist, full Trad.
The FSSP/Indult is objectively inferior, because of the position itself. I'm not critiquing the individual FSSP priests here. Some of them might be "good". But it's a fact that Traditional Catholics have always known, for example, that we don't need permission from any Pope or Church government to be Catholic: to attend sure Masses and receive sure sacraments. FSSP bombs out on this point completely. Hence they are inferior.
Matthew