Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Mass with no server  (Read 843 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Mass with no server
« on: March 17, 2019, 02:22:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How does Mass get celebrated say if for the Daily morning Mass there are no servers and only women are in congregation.  Is there a communion paten for communion as women cant go in sanctuary.  Who does responses? Rings bells? 

     I am experienced as an altar server in TLM so i was just curious as to how Mass would proceed in such a scenario in a parish, not a convent. 


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #1 on: March 17, 2019, 03:08:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When there is no server the priest can say both responses. When I was a nun at St. Joseph's monastery I would say the responses for the server since we did not have enough brothers. I would also ring the bells. But I was NEVER in the sanctuary. I have seen a priest who was in a parish say the responses himself but I can't remember if he rang the bell or not. I was much younger and the server had ended up fainting or falling ill so the priest was alone.


    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11666
    • Reputation: +6994/-498
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #2 on: March 17, 2019, 04:17:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bells are not an essential part of the Mass, but a trimming (for want of a better word). He could have somebody in the church answer the responses or he could say them himself.
    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #3 on: March 17, 2019, 07:44:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I disagree with the practice of allowing women to say the responses during Mass ... even if it is outside the sanctuary.  I consider this a grave abuse.  It's in line with the Novus Ordo's re-casting of the responses at Mass as simply an act of popular participation rather than a public act of the Church.

    Now, I also disagree with allowing lay altar servers say the responses.  I believe that these should be uttered by someone in the clerical state.  I believe that the original intent of the Minor Orders needs to be re-established and that all those in the Sanctuary should have received at least Minor Orders.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #4 on: March 17, 2019, 07:57:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I disagree with the practice of allowing women to say the responses during Mass ... even if it is outside the sanctuary.  I consider this a grave abuse.  It's in line with the Novus Ordo's re-casting of the responses at Mass as simply an act of popular participation rather than a public act of the Church.

    Now, I also disagree with allowing lay altar servers say the responses.  I believe that these should be uttered by someone in the clerical state.  I believe that the original intent of the Minor Orders needs to be re-established and that all those in the Sanctuary should have received at least Minor Orders.

    There aren't nearly enough seminarians for this. We aren't living in normal times, you know.

    How would the seminarians pursue their studies and live in common, if a few of them had to be posted to each Mass center so they could serve?

    And if you propose having laymen receive minor orders (kind of like the Permanent Diaconate, only for Minor Orders) that would be bad too, as you can't receive Minor Orders without being tonsured first, and then you're a cleric (with all the duties and privileges of that status).

    So I fail to understand what you're proposing here.

    "For the Crisis to end, and then..."
    Well, if that's all it takes, then let's do it!

    Matthew


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #5 on: March 17, 2019, 08:19:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There aren't nearly enough seminarians for this. We aren't living in normal times, you know.

    How would the seminarians pursue their studies and live in common, if a few of them had to be posted to each Mass center so they could serve?

    And if you propose having laymen receive minor orders (kind of like the Permanent Diaconate, only for Minor Orders) that would be bad too, as you can't receive Minor Orders without being tonsured first, and then you're a cleric (with all the duties and privileges of that status).

    So I fail to understand what you're proposing here.

    "For the Crisis to end, and then..."
    Well, if that's all it takes, then let's do it!

    Matthew
    Ladislaus may be thinking from an Eastern perspective, where laymen can and do receive Minor Orders. I knew a college professor who was also a tonsured reader for the Divine Liturgy.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #6 on: March 17, 2019, 09:53:04 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • There aren't nearly enough seminarians for this. We aren't living in normal times, you know.

    My position is that the Minor Orders shouldn't be limited to seminarians.  They've become reduced from their original intent into a mere stepping stone on the way to the priesthood.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #7 on: March 17, 2019, 09:55:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ladislaus may be thinking from an Eastern perspective, where laymen can and do receive Minor Orders. I knew a college professor who was also a tonsured reader for the Divine Liturgy.

    Yes, I saw this after I had posted my response.  Precisely.  But not just Eastern; this was also the original practice of the Latin Church.  These Minor Orders once had real significance.  You became a Lector (Cantor in the East) precisely so that you would be commissioned by the Church to exercise a very specific sacred (liturgical) function, and not as a merely ceremonial gesture.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #8 on: March 17, 2019, 09:57:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And if you propose having laymen receive minor orders (kind of like the Permanent Diaconate, only for Minor Orders) that would be bad too, as you can't receive Minor Orders without being tonsured first, and then you're a cleric (with all the duties and privileges of that status).

    I disagree that it would be bad for laymen to receive Minor Orders.  We can discuss that perhaps later tomorrow.

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11666
    • Reputation: +6994/-498
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #9 on: March 17, 2019, 10:37:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now, I also disagree with allowing lay altar servers say the responses.  I believe that these should be uttered by someone in the clerical state.  I believe that the original intent of the Minor Orders needs to be re-established and that all those in the Sanctuary should have received at least Minor Orders.
    For as long as I remember (probably round 1950) I have never heard of anyone but the altar server answering the responses in the Holy Mass. Besides is there going to be someone in minor orders in small towns? Seems very unrealistic to me. And if there is noone in minor orders, the priest must pray the part of the priest and of the people. That would be strange indeed.
    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    Offline Chrysostom

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 10
    • Reputation: +6/-24
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #10 on: March 18, 2019, 02:29:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I disagree with the practice of allowing women to say the responses during Mass ... even if it is outside the sanctuary.  I consider this a grave abuse.  It's in line with the Novus Ordo's re-casting of the responses at Mass as simply an act of popular participation rather than a public act of the Church.

    Now, I also disagree with allowing lay altar servers say the responses.  I believe that these should be uttered by someone in the clerical state.  I believe that the original intent of the Minor Orders needs to be re-established and that all those in the Sanctuary should have received at least Minor Orders.
    This is interesting and I agree but would love if you could share all you know on the minor orders for laymen. For example I know people like St Thomas More would serve a liturgical role at mass if needed. Would that mean he received a minor order? I assume singers would need to receive a minor order as well as it is a liturgical function. What is the process and obligations of the minor orders?


    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16730
    • Reputation: +1218/-4688
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mass with no server
    « Reply #11 on: March 18, 2019, 03:57:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • St Catherine Emerich used to ring the bells when she was the sacristan at the convent at Agnetenburg.