That's not what is going on here. 21 to 25 is one age range, but the examples and very odd remarks are another when the ages of 12-14 are thrown out with comments such as "chicky chicks".
Apologies, but I think your bias might be  causing you to miss the gaslighting and grooming comments made by some of the posters.
If we want to have a real discussion without tip-toeing around words then let's take this to the men's forum.

Do you think it possible that that WWCS is using the phrase "chicky chics" to push user's buttons, and that it is working?  

Do you think it possible that that WWCS is using the phrase "chicky chics" to push user's buttons, and that it is working? 

Yes. He just loves to fight with the women.

Rather than accuse users of being sɛҳuąƖly frustrated, incels, porn addicts, molesters, and molestees, let us hear some rational arguments as to why it would be immoral for a male, of any age, to marry a female aged, let's say, 14-16 years old with parental consent. Most users will certainly find marriage of ages 14-15 creepy, weird, etc. (16 as well, but maybe slightly less so)..but let's hear some logical, rational arguments as to why it is immoral

Well technically it is not immoral (It is hard for me to write that because I know some women will take that the wrong way, and what do I really know about daughters, I have none)  But to be honest the likelihood of finding a woman in that age range that is willing to marry and parents let marry is probably very little.

The arguments is that this society (the year 2025) has not prepared, no supports women making that choice at that age.  Women will do what is standard.  They will not look different to their friends.  It is really not a discussion of morality, but a discussion of reality.

And on the flip side a majority of young men do not respect woman as they should.  I don't want to argue about this.  I just want it admitted that both men and women are imperfect.  Instead of attacking the imperfections we should try to find things to encourage each other with.

Just my two cents from paying attention to what the young woman are talking about.  It matters to me because I have sons.  My thought process is that it might be easier for my sons to pay attention to whomever God puts in their path and if the woman is not already a Traditional Catholic that she is open to converting.  My sons are probably going to have to be expert apologists (Is that the right word?).  Anyways, I digress. 

I really do have a lot of sympathy for a single, traditional man in the world.  It is not easy.  I am also afraid that it is going to get harder before it gets better.

If you are really interested, befriend their dads, because if the daughter-father relationship is good, the daughter will not do anything that disappoints her father.  Meaning that if the father dislikes you, then you have no chance with the daughter.

Attraction Market Value? Now you have said the quiet part out loud. The title of this thread should be "sɛҳuąƖ Attraction." Maybe we need a thread on "When does sɛҳuąƖ attraction and oogling females veer into sinful behavior?"

Catholic men, in spite of the human tendency to fall into sin by objectifying women in terms of their sɛҳuąƖ attraction, try to rise above focusing on the Attraction Market Value of a woman. Instead, Catholic men bring to mind their wives, mothers, sisters and other females who they know would not want to be leered at and do their best to avert their eyes, especially when immodest dress is what is increading the Attraction Market Value.

How many non-Catholics who are interested in becomming Catholic see a thread like this and are disgusted by the immature blathering about sɛҳuąƖ attraction. They may think "What the heck; I heard tradition was true Catholiocism, but these people are low lifes."

I don't care about optics. That kind of thinking leads to the neo-SSPX, compromise with the World and Vatican II, and hiring corporate branding agencies.

You are totally going off-base here into distraction land. What are you talking about sinful behavior in this context? Define your terms. I won't accept imprecise or vague terms like "ogling". This isn't CNN and we aren't going to call people nebulous terms like "racist". What does that even mean? You tell us.

Are we talking about immoral speech? Sins of thought? Seeking fornication? Impure actions? Self abuse? Let's be specific.

Like with other communist propaganda, like "hate crime", there are already laws against assault, murder, etc. We don't need specific laws against "hate crimes". And are some crimes "love crimes"? When a white man breaks a bottle over a white man's head, is it done out of love?

Matthew

In conclusion:

When we talk about ladies being attractive, we are talking about physical beauty. That's it. Not talking about committing ANY KIND of sins with them.

I think we have lost the ability to recognize beautiful bodies without equating it to something sinful.  How do we start seeing God in all things?  How do we recognize are own sins and not project them on to others?  I don't have the answers, but I don't think we can just ignore it either and hope this goes away.

Wasn't there a time period where compliments were good things?  Why are we so afraid of them now?

For example,

Man: "there are a few preteen girls at my chapel. Maybe in a few years there will be some options for marriage..."

Mother of preteen girl: "Ok, buddy, let's see if you're established enough to get married a few years from now. You really need to make sure you bring something to the table besides drawing breath. I would certainly advise my daughter against marrying someone like you, who has so little to offer. And I have raised her in such a way that she values my advice. So good luck on that!"

See how easy that was? No name calling or exaggeration necessary. You can be frank. You can be brutal. Just don't call names or exaggerate (which is a form of lying) by calling someone "pedophile" which is defined as "a perversion wherein a person is sɛҳuąƖly attracted to pre-pubescent children".

Yes thank you, the reason I make these posts is because I like to see real discussions like this, it helps both the men and women Under their place. It also shows who has feminists conditioning.

Instead most of the 'arguments' have been insults like, pedo, incel, muhamhead etc.

Frankly I don't need to make these posts, because I feel like I have options at my chapel. But it's still good to discuss.

Yes. He just loves to fight with the women.

It should be obvious from this posts denying origin sin..  unfortunately many users here conflate his comments with other users.