Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Marry without love for son  (Read 8494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Marry without love for son
« Reply #45 on: January 16, 2024, 02:49:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • From all the new information OP provided things are definitely much better than originally seen. Salvageable.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #46 on: January 16, 2024, 06:23:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I talked with him today over the phone. He recommended I don't move too quickly and to ease up on the rules. And to find out if she really wants to convert to the faith. I suppose I took her resistance to the rules as her not wanting to convert. I asked her this evening now that things have cooled between us. She said she believes God exists and that she has no problems with the Catholic Church. She says she doesn't know much and wants to know what to do next. She even suggested we fly to Ohio to talk to the priest in person.

    He also said that we should talk to the visiting priest next time they're in town. I have mixed feelings about this. I'm nervous that if we do this, we get locked into the sedevacantist route, which like I mentioned earlier I'd rather not dig any deeper into at the moment. I don't have an issue with attending the mass though so I guess I'll just be upfront with the priest that we're not so sure about sedevacantism and that we attend the SSPX mass. I wasn't upfront over the phone because I didn't know how to bring it up tactfully.

    C
    Good to see that he suggested some of the same things some of us did here.  If this is a CMRI priest, then you don't have to worry.  The visiting priest will probably encourage the SV position, but he will not tell you you can't assist at a SSPX mass in the meantime. Just take one step at a time. 


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27668/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #47 on: January 16, 2024, 07:12:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I talked with him today over the phone. He recommended I don't move too quickly and to ease up on the rules. And to find out if she really wants to convert to the faith. I suppose I took her resistance to the rules as her not wanting to convert. I asked her this evening now that things have cooled between us. She said she believes God exists and that she has no problems with the Catholic Church. She says she doesn't know much and wants to know what to do next. She even suggested we fly to Ohio to talk to the priest in person.

    He also said that we should talk to the visiting priest next time they're in town. I have mixed feelings about this. I'm nervous that if we do this, we get locked into the sedevacantist route, which like I mentioned earlier I'd rather not dig any deeper into at the moment. I don't have an issue with attending the mass though so I guess I'll just be upfront with the priest that we're not so sure about sedevacantism and that we attend the SSPX mass. I wasn't upfront over the phone because I didn't know how to bring it up tactfully.

    C

    Great news.  I agree with the priest about easing up on the rules.  It's probably too much too fast for someone who's at her point in the possible conversion process.  I think sometimes people get scrupulous about imposing these rules, feeling that God will judge them i they don't, but even St. Thomas clearly taught about "rebuking the sinner" that it's only required when you think it'll have the right effect.  In fact, St. Augustine said that there are situations where charity might require NOT rebuking the sinner if in fact you judge that the person might not react well to it, either double down on it.  In your case, it might become an impediment / obstacle to her ultimate conversion.

    I always emphasize Prudence, which is almost a forgotten virtue, but it's the queen of virtue.  There are principles of things that are right and wrong, but then their application can vary depending on the circuмstances.  So, for instance, as above, the core reason for rebuking the sinner is for their conversion, but if in PRUDENCE you determine that a rebuke might work contrary to that goal (the person might double down, or it might impede their conversion), the core reason behind rebuking the sinner might actually suggest NOT rebuking the sinner, and in your case, easing up on the rules.  If the rules are the main reason she's pushing back, then easing up on these might be the most prudent course of action long term.  If, with these out of the way, she can sincerely convert to the faith, then at some point she could very willingly comply with the rules, instead of being forced to do so "kicking and screaming", as it were.

    Depending on which priest you spoke to in Ohio, you're probably not going to be "locked into the sedevacantist route".  SSPV, for instance, e.g. Fathers Jenkins, Greenwell, etc. are not particularly dogmatic sedevacantists, nor are the CMRI for that mattter.  And it may not be necessary to fly to Ohio either, as phone conversations (we also have Facetime, Zoom, etc. these days) might suffice given the stage you're at with her.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #48 on: January 17, 2024, 11:12:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I've been thinking about this and think that maybe a book initially aimed at youth might be a good idea. Older books that were written for young people are really not very "childish" at all by our current standards. There's a book called My Catholic Faith: A Catechism in Pictures that includes lots of information and very nice pictures. You can find it several places. Here's a link to the one carried by Angelus Press.
    https://angeluspress.org/products/my-catholic-faith


    Don't forget to get some good books for your son, too. Fr. Lovasik made lots of picture books for young children. A few of them have been "updated", but you can usually identify the newer ones just by the cover art.
    https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=598740777&sxsrf=ACQVn0-NQco977i3sm3TTbi5vbx-GRQm_A:1705393309716&q=lawrence+lovasik+books&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj5xLWTveGDAxVlmmoFHePdDmQQ0pQJegQIDRAB&biw=1745&bih=967&dpr=1.1
    It's funny you mention My Catholic Faith. We have that book and that's the one I gave to her and had her start reading yesterday. I wasn't so sure it was best so glad it's the one you recommend for her.

    Thanks for the picture book suggestions! I bought a few children's Catholic books already but wasn't too keen on them. I'll check out Fr. Lovasik's.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #49 on: January 17, 2024, 11:12:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Great news.  I agree with the priest about easing up on the rules.  It's probably too much too fast for someone who's at her point in the possible conversion process.  I think sometimes people get scrupulous about imposing these rules, feeling that God will judge them i they don't, but even St. Thomas clearly taught about "rebuking the sinner" that it's only required when you think it'll have the right effect.  In fact, St. Augustine said that there are situations where charity might require NOT rebuking the sinner if in fact you judge that the person might not react well to it, either double down on it.  In your case, it might become an impediment / obstacle to her ultimate conversion.

    I always emphasize Prudence, which is almost a forgotten virtue, but it's the queen of virtue.  There are principles of things that are right and wrong, but then their application can vary depending on the circuмstances.  So, for instance, as above, the core reason for rebuking the sinner is for their conversion, but if in PRUDENCE you determine that a rebuke might work contrary to that goal (the person might double down, or it might impede their conversion), the core reason behind rebuking the sinner might actually suggest NOT rebuking the sinner, and in your case, easing up on the rules.  If the rules are the main reason she's pushing back, then easing up on these might be the most prudent course of action long term.  If, with these out of the way, she can sincerely convert to the faith, then at some point she could very willingly comply with the rules, instead of being forced to do so "kicking and screaming", as it were.

    Depending on which priest you spoke to in Ohio, you're probably not going to be "locked into the sedevacantist route".  SSPV, for instance, e.g. Fathers Jenkins, Greenwell, etc. are not particularly dogmatic sedevacantists, nor are the CMRI for that mattter.  And it may not be necessary to fly to Ohio either, as phone conversations (we also have Facetime, Zoom, etc. these days) might suffice given the stage you're at with her.
    Thanks for explaining Prudence. The priest is associated with St. Gertrude the Great Church. 


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #50 on: January 17, 2024, 11:13:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I forgot to add C at the end. :fryingpan:

    C

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #51 on: January 18, 2024, 06:09:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for explaining Prudence. The priest is associated with St. Gertrude the Great Church.
    I'm confused.  If you don't live in Ohio (and attend a SSPX mass), what made you contact this priest?

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27668/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #52 on: January 18, 2024, 06:18:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for explaining Prudence. The priest is associated with St. Gertrude the Great Church.

    Yes, as far as I know SGG do tend to be dogmatic SV, so they will try to strongly persuade you along those lines, though of course they can't force you to do other things.  If that becomes a problem for you, Father Jenkins' group in Cincy are more moderate in that regard.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #53 on: January 18, 2024, 06:48:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If it's not going too far I would also begin to explain to her how embracing the Catholic faith would benefit her in a material sense.  Where appropriate I would even reward any move she makes towards this goal. I'm not suggesting bribery by the way. But as Ladislaus said prudence is key in the situation.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #54 on: January 18, 2024, 10:11:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Be careful with the Lovasik books. Some of the newer printings, which have the same covers, have been updated. For example, they call Our Lady's apparition to St. Dominic a "legend" in the Rosary book. Another line from a page on the Annunciation "But Mary was confused by the angel's greeting and even more by this request. She had never slept with a man; she was a virgin." 

    Also, the OP seems to have absorbed the modern notion of love and not the Catholic understanding. The simplest answer to his question is to love this woman as Christ loved the Church. Women are wired to desire such love and my hunch is she will respond. 

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #55 on: January 18, 2024, 10:23:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Be careful with the Lovasik books. Some of the newer printings, which have the same covers, have been updated. For example, they call Our Lady's apparition to St. Dominic a "legend" in the Rosary book. Another line from a page on the Annunciation "But Mary was confused by the angel's greeting and even more by this request. She had never slept with a man; she was a virgin."

    Also, the OP seems to have absorbed the modern notion of love and not the Catholic understanding. The simplest answer to his question is to love this woman as Christ loved the Church. Women are wired to desire such love and my hunch is she will respond.

    I wish this were the case but this has been dismantled where women have been brainwashed to want the exact opposite.  Any man who actually loves them that way or wants to love them that way are seen as "too nice" or "clingy" or "desparate."  The entire society needs an overhaul in order for the correct order to be established again.  


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #56 on: January 19, 2024, 02:24:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Whatever state "society" is in does not absolve the individual of his obligation. Society has been in rebellion since the beginning of time. The fact remains that if, after counsel from wise priests and prayer and discernment, the OP marries this woman, he MUST love her. Love is not something one falls into, it is an act of the will. It is clear from his original post that he does not yet have the proper understanding. Furthermore, it is best for him to try this approach now if he is to have any hope of her conversion and making this work for the sake of his son. Perhaps she will not respond, but it is his only shot at a Catholic marriage with her. And he ought to know that it won't be an easy thing to find a good trad woman to marry him when he already has a record, so to speak. 

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #57 on: January 19, 2024, 04:59:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    He also said that we should talk to the visiting priest next time they're in town. I have mixed feelings about this. I'm nervous that if we do this, we get locked into the sedevacantist route, which like I mentioned earlier I'd rather not dig any deeper into at the moment. I don't have an issue with attending the mass though so I guess I'll just be upfront with the priest that we're not so sure about sedevacantism and that we attend the SSPX mass.
    SSPX vs Sedevecantist - please don't get overly concerned with the Trad flavor, at this point.  A valid, Traditional priest is the most important.  

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #58 on: January 19, 2024, 10:49:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm confused.  If you don't live in Ohio (and attend a SSPX mass), what made you contact this priest?
    Correct, I'm not in Ohio. He's the priest responsible for the mission chapel that's driving distance from me. I came across the chapel in the Traditio directory* and called the number. He answered. That was a few months ago and since then, I've waffled many many times in my head between SSPX, Resistance, Sedevantism, Home Alone, and all the warring factions in them. I'm now at the stage where I'm exhausted from it all and don't want to think too much about it anymore. The SSPX mass is fine for now, despite my distrust of the society. It's the most convenient.

    As for the SSPX priest, I had talked with him about my wife and the sacraments before but I have such a hard time getting advice from him. He's a laid back personality and his response is usually along the lines of "you can if you want". It's the reason I didn't want to speak with him on the recent situation with my wife. And why I thought of the sedevacantist priest who had given a lot of instruction that first time I spoke with him.

    * http://www-traditio-com/tradlib/masslat.pdf (replace - with .)

    Yes, as far as I know SGG do tend to be dogmatic SV, so they will try to strongly persuade you along those lines, though of course they can't force you to do other things.  If that becomes a problem for you, Father Jenkins' group in Cincy are more moderate in that regard.
    That's the impression I got when I first talked to the priest. He can't force me, yes, but the pressure would weigh on me. I will look into Father Jenkins, this is the first I've heard of his name. Although, I do recognize his face.

    If it's not going too far I would also begin to explain to her how embracing the Catholic faith would benefit her in a material sense.  Where appropriate I would even reward any move she makes towards this goal. I'm not suggesting bribery by the way. But as Ladislaus said prudence is key in the situation.
    By "material sense", do you mean grace? Or that I would be more kind to her? Rewarding sounds like a great idea.

    Be careful with the Lovasik books. Some of the newer printings, which have the same covers, have been updated. For example, they call Our Lady's apparition to St. Dominic a "legend" in the Rosary book. Another line from a page on the Annunciation "But Mary was confused by the angel's greeting and even more by this request. She had never slept with a man; she was a virgin."

    Also, the OP seems to have absorbed the modern notion of love and not the Catholic understanding. The simplest answer to his question is to love this woman as Christ loved the Church. Women are wired to desire such love and my hunch is she will respond.
    Thanks for that warning. I'm a bit aware of the deceit that goes on in newer editions of traditional books. But to use the same covers is frustrating. I worry my wife would read such things and absorb it. Those example are shocking.

    Whatever state "society" is in does not absolve the individual of his obligation. Society has been in rebellion since the beginning of time. The fact remains that if, after counsel from wise priests and prayer and discernment, the OP marries this woman, he MUST love her. Love is not something one falls into, it is an act of the will. It is clear from his original post that he does not yet have the proper understanding. Furthermore, it is best for him to try this approach now if he is to have any hope of her conversion and making this work for the sake of his son. Perhaps she will not respond, but it is his only shot at a Catholic marriage with her. And he ought to know that it won't be an easy thing to find a good trad woman to marry him when he already has a record, so to speak.
    I believe this is the same poster who said to "to love this woman as Christ loved the Church". That's a very vague notion to me. I don't quite understand it to be honest. I will think about this more, thank you.

    And yes, I'm aware of the realities of the alternative.

    SSPX vs Sedevecantist - please don't get overly concerned with the Trad flavor, at this point.  A valid, Traditional priest is the most important. 

    You're right. I've found it to be terribly confusing and demoralizing. I have a handful of Resistance and Sedevantists priests I like to listen to but when argumentation on who is right comes up, I skip it.

    C

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11934
    • Reputation: +7292/-500
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Marry without love for son
    « Reply #59 on: January 19, 2024, 11:12:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    I believe this is the same poster who said to "to love this woman as Christ loved the Church". That's a very vague notion to me. I don't quite understand it to be honest. I will think about this more, thank you.
    I am not that poster, but "to love this woman as Christ loved the Church" means that you would be prepared to give your life for her, as Christ gave His Life for us, (the Church) by dying on the Cross to save us, so we can have Eternal Life. That also means giving yourself wholly to her.
    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    +RIP 2024