Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
It’s true in much of the higher species of the animal kingdom. The females hang together with the young and males go solo until it’s mating season. Some animals travel as mixed groups with a male leader, the remaining males being still under their mother’s care. In a few cases where the group is matriarchal, for example, elephants, the fully grown males go solo until mating season. In creatures that mate for life, it is couples that flock together with other couples.
I noticed a few presidents of Brazil were 20+ to around 30 years age difference with their wives, whether or not valid. I wonder if it is something of a thing over there that is not frowned upon. Nevertheless, it all depends on the situation.
Firstly, sugar is bad for you.What do you consider an age gap? How much is too much?Are you male or female?Roughly how old are you?Personally I think mainly older women get upset with age gaps because their 'clock' is ticking. While some younger men get upset because they can't compete.I consider an age gap to be 5+ yearsNo age gap is too much as the purpose of married is to have children. So it's not about the age gap but fertility.I am me.In my 20s.I keep seeing age gaps demonised online yet the same people have no issue with Elvis Presley and Priscilla Beaulieu having a 10 yr gap (14 and 24) because Elvis 'respected' her and she didn't want sex before marriage so he wasn't a 'groomer'. Yet some members of this forum have vilified men for wanting something similar (or rather something more Holy). So are these secular people more rational than some trad Catholics? Or are they just making an exception because of their personal like of Elvis since he was rich, tall, handsome and famous?Also on the wedding day they are called the Bride and Brides-GROOM, so why is the term 'groomer' used as an attack? Seems like a hidden attack on marriage if you ask me.
I think you are desperately attempting to justify some imperfections in your nature. I suggest you speak with a priest about this topic.
Indeed. This topic was discussed ad nauseam in the other thread the OP created about whether men really prefer teenage girls. It’s time for him to talk to a traditional priest rather than try to get support for his point of view on a forum.
We don’t know, so why not encourage him to ask? Are you afraid of what the priest will tell him?
And what is a priest going to tell him?
You can be sure the priest won’t say a 12 year old is a-ok.
Okay, on the other thread there was discussion about 12 years old being the limit historically. A few thought that was reasonable for this day and age.
I'm guessing you are a woman? Discussing the limit is not the same as saying you are attracted to 12 yr olds. Plus admiring a young girls beauty and wanting to provide and support them is not the same as sɛҳuąƖ attraction. Most 12 yr olds are cute but not sexy if that makes sense