Apologies- I am posted too soon-here is the cleaned up version for the OP
I am not going to assume anything; I will directly ask the questions. I am also not interested in name-calling. I am here in a forum to debate and discuss. If you need to do that—knock yourself out.
Ok, sorry for the names, posters like Simonjewed and other actual feminist have set me off somewhat.
**Yes, and five years is a long time for a child to develop, learn and gain experiences while a 30 year old has already matured and is now aging (but still gaining experiences).
30 yr is quite old for a woman, a man being experienced is required as he is the leader but not so for the women since her role is to be obedient to her husband.
Are you looking at 10 year old children to determine if they will be a potential spouse for you in the future based on aesthetics?
No, a beautiful 10 yr old will be have more appeal than a 30yr old, though not sɛҳuąƖly as 10yr olds do not have any 'womanly' charm, it's more so that at 30 a women is quite old and long past her prime. It's similar to how being overweight is very unappealing to men, the Asame with a woman's age.
Words are important because they convey information. Words also change meanings over the ages. Instead of becoming defensive, look at this logically. You seem to be upset when your logic is challenged but if the reader of the post understands the word and definition differently from how you use it/intended then there is a problem. The word “attractive” doesn’t require the adjective “sɛҳuąƖly” as it has its own meaning.
For reference, this the definition (definition one) I used when I read your post: https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/attractive
“Having the quality of attracting; drawing to; as the attractive force of bodies.”
With that definition in mind, read this statement, “10-12 yr olds are more attractive THAN 30+ YEAR OLDS.”
Your definition is more in lines with physics, e.g gravity, magnesium. I think love makes it more clear, love being wanting the good of someone else, usually for people, the more beautiful something/someone is the more easier it is to love it. In the case of Catholics that's desiring someone to go to heaven.
The 10-12 yr old have more potential than the 30yr olds, simply due to not having reaching their prime years yet the other group has long past it. It's like an investment, one has yet to reach the top while the other is already into it's decline.
** Just to confirm: the “risk” you mention refers to wanting a large number of children and believing that a younger woman provides more potential for childbearing. Is that correct?
The younger a woman, the more children she can have, younger ladies also are more fertile and less likely to have genetic problems with their offspring etc autism.
How many children is too little or too much? I have a relative who married at 27 and there are 13 children and I have another relative who married at 20 and he and his wife were unable to conceive.
As many as God gives. See the picture below

Words don’t “trip me up”, rather, the incorrect use of them (or was it correct- you will need to confirm).
What definition are you using for the word appeal?
More along the lines of future potential and physical beauty, if I wanted to say that a 10yr old is more sɛҳuąƖly appealing than a 30yr old I would have simply said that, but that's not what I was thinking when I used the term attraction/appeal. 10yr olds have no development, so they do not have that sort of appeal to me. A good face is pleasing to look at, and along that line it just means that this or that person will become a fine young lady or young man when they are older.
I am short on time so this is just a quick response.