If it's not your adultery it's none of your business.  Trying to dig up a dead person's imagined sins from 40 years ago, AND scandalizing others by trying to get them involved in your waste of time is just placing black marks on your soul anyone's that participates with your trying to reveal the sins of another.
Read the 8th commandment.

If it's not your adultery it's none of your business.  Trying to dig up a dead person's imagined sins from 40 years ago, AND scandalizing others by trying to get them involved in your waste of time is just placing black marks on your soul anyone's that participates with your trying to reveal the sins of another.
Read the 8th commandment.

False.  Enemies of the faith, such as was Wojtyla, must be exposed at every turn.  Nobody owed Luther any consideration for his "good name", when he would use it and was using it to destroy souls, and therefore he had no right to any good name, and any who knew anything that would have discredited him had a positive obligation to reveal it.  Wojtyla did extreme damage to the faith PRECISELY due to his false reputation for holiness, for "sanctity", the santo subito.  I know and know of so many "conservatives" among the Conciliars who have imbibed the heresies of Wojtyla precisely due to some misguided devotion to his perceived sanctity.  If the devil could fake the virtues of a Padre Pio to get people to swallow heresy, and then God permitted it, he would do so in a second.

Wojtyla was a wrecker of the faith and needs to be exposed.  Others, in lesser positions, less so ... provided they do not pose a harm to other but are merely committing private sin, etc.

Even the Novus Ordo investigation process was set back a bit by the discovery of Wojtyla's ... "love letters" to a married woman.  Now, while simply being photographed with and spending time with a married woman does not constitute adultery in the strict sense, there are degrees of adultery, as per Our Lord, where one can commit adultery in the mind, and even if the attachment was not physical or sɛҳuąƖ or even romantic, even an emotional relationship constitutes adultery at least in a remote way.  We're not judging whether he committed mortal sin, as that's in the internal forum and known only to God.  But we can certainly undermine his false reputation for sanctity that has been leveraged to lead untold millions into grave error and heresy.

When a man sends letters and goes on ski trips with a married woman that is adultery.

Yes, it's a species of adultery, albeit more remote from the actual physical act ... as per Our Lord about how one can commit adultery even in the mind.

There are some pictures of Wojtyla on what appeared to be almost a "family picnic", not only with this same young lady, with Wojtyla in his shorts, but also accompanied by a young child, about toddler age, who bore a remarkable resemblance to Wojtyla.  I was at a church picnic where a Traditional priest was showing the picture and commenting on it.

Wojtyla had been widely suspected of being a Commie collaborator, a "Pax" priest, even in his day, as while other truly anti-Communist prelates (Wyszyński, Mindszenty, Slipyj, Stepinac) were imprisoned, tortured, and otherwise persecuted, Wojtyla was permitted to go on world lecture tours speaking about the new theology and phenomenology.  Not only that, but Wojtyla was hand-picked by the Commie official in Poland to be a bishop.  In Commie Poland, they forced the Church to submit candidates for episcopal consecration to the Commie official and have them approved, and Wojtyla appeared on no list, and so the official kept vetoing everyone on every list submitted, until he finally said, quite bluntly, "I will only have Wojtyla."  Of course, Weigel, who wrote about this, claimed that "oh, boy did they regret that, as they had no idea what they were in store for."  Utterly laughable.  They knew EXACTLY what they had in Wojtyla, a Jєωιѕн infiltrator and Commie agent whom they could count on to further the destruction (as they saw it) of the Catholic Church, their once-intransigent enemy.

False.  Enemies of the faith, such as was Wojtyla, must be exposed at every turn.  Nobody owed Luther any consideration for his "good name", when he would use it and was using it to destroy souls, and therefore he had no right to any good name, and any who knew anything that would have discredited him had a positive obligation to reveal it.  Wojtyla did extreme damage to the faith PRECISELY due to his false reputation for holiness, for "sanctity", the santo subito.  I know and know of so many "conservatives" among the Conciliars who have imbibed the heresies of Wojtyla precisely due to some misguided devotion to his perceived sanctity.  If the devil could fake the virtues of a Padre Pio to get people to swallow heresy, and then God permitted it, he would do so in a second.

Wojtyla was a wrecker of the faith and needs to be exposed.  Others, in lesser positions, less so ... provided they do not pose a harm to other but are merely committing private sin, etc.

Even the Novus Ordo investigation process was set back a bit by the discovery of Wojtyla's ... "love letters" to a married woman.  Now, while simply being photographed with and spending time with a married woman does not constitute adultery in the strict sense, there are degrees of adultery, as per Our Lord, where one can commit adultery in the mind, and even if the attachment was not physical or sɛҳuąƖ or even romantic, even an emotional relationship constitutes adultery at least in a remote way.  We're not judging whether he committed mortal sin, as that's in the internal forum and known only to God.  But we can certainly undermine his false reputation for sanctity that has been leveraged to lead untold millions into grave error and heresy.

THIS.

-Matthew