Which post was his? Did you delete it? I don't recall reading anything that sounded like it was from him.

I have read in Catholic websites that purgatory exists in order to make you perfectly "clean." These websites usually pull out a quote from scripture, I think from the book of the Apocalypse. "Nothing unclean can enter heaven." Or something like that. If people aren't totally perfect and can still enter heaven,  then why does purgatory exist? Purgatory should purge you so that you may become 100 percent clean and therefore be worthy of heaven, no?

How am I contradicting myself?

I was referring to this: "If people aren't totally perfect and can still enter heaven,  then why does purgatory exist? Purgatory should purge you so that you may become 100 percent clean and therefore be worthy of heaven, no?"

The first sentence is false, because obviously nothing imperfect enters Heaven, which is what you say in the second sentence, so you contradict yourself here by answering your own question. 

Therefore it only makes sense that one must be TOTALly imperfect, wicked, to enter hell.

As it has been pointed out to you already, one mortal sin is of infinite malice and wickedness, although there is a hierarchy of evil of course. Blasphemy is regarded as the worst sin of all, but that doesn't make fornication not a mortal sin anymore does it?

And we know from scripture and tradition that hell can be good, even to be described as a paradise.
 
You should go read some pre-V2 Bible commentaries again. Abraham's Bosom was not the Hell of the damned, so no, Hell cannot be good or a paradise.

The punishment for the ignorant, in the traditional view, would be an etrnal loss of heaven.

This is assuming anyone who is ignorant cannot ever make it or come to the truth, but we know that is false, so your objections are baseless.

And even then, I don't see why God wouldn't be able to allow such people to remain 'blissfully ignorant' of what they've lost. You know, cuz He loves us.
 
Well this is what the limbo of the children is, don't you know?

Honesty,  the whole idea of sufficient grace seems contradictory. Catholicism says we are born evil, pretty much. We are born concupiscient, hearts aimed towards evil, etc etc. How could a person naturally reach salvation? Isn't that 'pelagianism'? Doesn't traditional catholicism say that salvation is purely of God and His grace,  and not at all by our own efforts? If so, how does following a natural law gain us a supernatural end?
 
That's not what I said, I said that if they follow the natural law, God will further help them and bestow supernatural faith on them and make them come to the truth. I said this because you were complaining that all the ignorant don't have a chance and they suffer so much here and will suffer even more in Hell etc.

Also, the sufficent grace theory, to me, is like throwing a plastic bag to someone drowning in a pool. If they drown, it is their fault for not utilizing something so (seemingly) small and insignificant in thier tumultuous situation.
 
You don't even understand most of anything you claim to be "wrong" and you're simply throwing out typical modern liberal objections filled with ignorance, so you better be quiet and go and lear something.
 
I don't understand the traditional Christian desire to see everyone burn and suffer. Even children. I remember reading through the Glories of Mary by Alphonsus and seeing a story (MYTH) where a 5 year old went to suffer in hell. LOL! I'm only laughing at how overkill and ridiculous this example is. 

It's not a desire, it's how things are, and yes, the 5 year old boy story is true.

Again, here you are, with truth staring you in the face, and all you do is scoff and complain about this and that, while complaining about people who "don't know." 

You're a perfect example of why people go to Hell. Keep on laughing.