This has nothing to do with a couple. Basically it involves some correspondence that I inadvertantly saw where the party admits that he's in a state of sin (unrepentant) and going to Communion anyway, knowing they're sacrilegeous Communions. Normally it would be detraction to reveal this sin. Sometimes with detraction, however, sufficient grave reason, such as potential harm to a third party, would warrant revealing the information. In this case the grave injury would be to Our Lord in a sacrilegeous Communion. Obviously I'll ask a priest about this, but I am interested in anyone's opinions. I am not making "inferences" about whether or not the person might be in a state of sin ... as most of these posts suggest.