Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Immodest outfits  (Read 741 times)

1 Member and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Immodest outfits
« on: Yesterday at 08:11:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sometimes the younger girls at my chapel dress in a manner that is frankly too revealing. I don't need to see a young woman in tight clothing in the house of God.

    Should I tell them off? Should I talk to the parents about it? 

    It's quite a distraction and it can be scandalous. Plus I don't think our Lord and Lady would approve of their outfits.

    Offline Giovanni Berto

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1451
    • Reputation: +1177/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 08:21:36 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • You should tell the priest. Never go to the woman directly.


    Offline AMDG forever

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 100
    • Reputation: +126/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 08:47:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sometimes the younger girls at my chapel dress in a manner that is frankly too revealing. I don't need to see a young woman in tight clothing in the house of God.

    Should I tell them off? Should I talk to the parents about it?

    It's quite a distraction and it can be scandalous. Plus I don't think our Lord and Lady would approve of their outfits.
    Hey, no offense to you but how tight or revealing are the clothes? Some people are overly sensitive to that stuff.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 09:07:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You should tell the priest. Never go to the woman directly.
    This is bad advice.  It's not the priest's job to be fashion police.

    Public shaming should come back.  It's the only thing that works on women.  You see a women dressed inappropriately, you say something like "Wow, didn't know you could dress like that a church."  

    It's not about being mean, it's about correcting bad behavior.  It works.  That's how society used to operate.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47525
    • Reputation: +28124/-5255
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 09:10:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Correct advice is in fact to tell the priest, and if the priest does nothing, that's on him.  You are not in charge of the chapel or responsible for how people dress or behave.  You are responsible only for yourself.  If the priest does nothing, you can go to the priest's superior (if he has one).  If it's an occasion of sin for you, then you should go somewhere else.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47525
    • Reputation: +28124/-5255
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 09:21:28 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is bad advice.  It's not the priest's job to be fashion police.

    Public shaming should come back.  It's the only thing that works on women.  You see a women dressed inappropriately, you say something like "Wow, didn't know you could dress like that a church." 

    It's not about being mean, it's about correcting bad behavior.  It works.  That's how society used to operate.

    THIS type of garbage is why some people leave Trad chapels after one visit because they think it's a cult.  Snide comments like that absolute are mean and not about "correcting bad behavior".  If you want to correct the behavior, then a lady (not some man) should be designated to very kindly inform the individual, not engage in backbiting sarcastic crap that you pretend is now "charity".  That's just nasty behavior that you're trying to pretend is charity.

    While it's not the priest's job to be fashion police, and generally it's inappropriate for him to do so ... to a point, it's his job to say something, communicate the standards of dress, and if necessary designate some kind lady who could, without coming across nasty as per your advice here, gently offer correction.  After several attempts at correction fail, then other steps should be taken, depending on the gravity of it.

    So, I said it's not the priests' job to be fashion police ... only to a point.  But Canon Law actually requires that a priest refuse the Saraments to those who approach immodestly dressed ... so it's not entirely true.  But, it's also not true that the priest isn't ULTIMATELY responsible, and so he should delegate that responsibility to someone else, not let rogue half-cocked snobs go around making sarcastic comments, giving the place a decidedly cult vibe, and possibly driving people away.

    This quasi-Pharisaical attitude that has infected many Trad groups would seem to be a strange combination of scrupulosity (where you feel that your'e required in conscience to rebuke all evil) and an extreme over-reaction against the laxity of the Conciliars and of the modern world.  We need to find the right balance.  No, we are not required to reprimand or rebuke all sinners.  We are only required to do so if we have authority over them (as the priest at the chapel would), AND if we believe that the rebuke would actuall have the desired effect of correcting the behavior rather than causing the individual to double down, and that reaction can be determined by HOW one does it.  Certain people do not have the right attitude, or even just the right personality ... to properly correct, and the priest should find someone who knows that can do it the right way, without making the place seem like a cult.

    And that goes for other situations too.  I've gone into Trad chapels where the ushers act like SS officers, embarrassing people by telling them they're in the wrong place or violating some kind of etiquette that they had no way ot knowing about, etc. ... and if that's the first impression you get walking into a Traditional chapel for the first time, the chances that you'll return were just reduced by 95%.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47525
    • Reputation: +28124/-5255
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 09:30:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 1) tell the priest
    2) if priest does nothing, tell his superior
    3) if neither does anything, then you've done all that's required of you, but if it's an occasion of sin for you, find some way to mitigate it, either by sitting all the way in the front, or on the other side of the church, or even, if necessary stay out in a vestibule area and go in only for Holy Communion, etc.  If it persists, and it causes sin, make sure you bring it up to that very priest in Confession, suggestion that his inaction had led to the sin ... and, if it's truly a near occasion, then you should find somewhere else to go to Mass

    Some of this could be mitigate by returning to the custom of having men on one side of the church, and women on the other.  Of course, there's this modern sensibility against separating families, but the Mass is primarily about worshipping God.  Younger children could sit near their mothers, while the older boys would go with their fathers.  That's the primary reason Our Lord was separated from Our Lady and St. Joseph at the temple.  So the occasion for the trip was because Our Lord had come of age.  Prior to that time, children would be with their mothers, but then when they came of age, they would be with their fathers, learning their trade or whatnot.  When people traveled back then, they often went in caravans, larger groups, to prevent being attacked by robbers for whom a couple people alone would be easy prey, and when they traveled in groups, the men often were with the men, and the women with the women.  So St. Joseph concluded that Our Lord was with Our Lady, as He had been accustomed to doing, whereas Our Lady assumed that He had gone with St. Joseph, now that He had come of age.  That is why Our Lord's response was that He was doing His Father's business, since that's precisely what would be expected, that a young man at that age would beging to undertake his father's business.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 10:35:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • THIS type of garbage is why some people leave Trad chapels after one visit because they think it's a cult.  Snide comments like that absolute are mean and not about "correcting bad behavior".  If you want to correct the behavior, then a lady (not some man) should be designated to very kindly inform the individual, not engage in backbiting sarcastic crap that you pretend is now "charity".  That's just nasty behavior that you're trying to pretend is charity.

    While it's not the priest's job to be fashion police, and generally it's inappropriate for him to do so ... to a point, it's his job to say something, communicate the standards of dress, and if necessary designate some kind lady who could, without coming across nasty as per your advice here, gently offer correction.  After several attempts at correction fail, then other steps should be taken, depending on the gravity of it.

    So, I said it's not the priests' job to be fashion police ... only to a point.  But Canon Law actually requires that a priest refuse the Saraments to those who approach immodestly dressed ... so it's not entirely true.  But, it's also not true that the priest isn't ULTIMATELY responsible, and so he should delegate that responsibility to someone else, not let rogue half-cocked snobs go around making sarcastic comments, giving the place a decidedly cult vibe, and possibly driving people away.

    This quasi-Pharisaical attitude that has infected many Trad groups would seem to be a strange combination of scrupulosity (where you feel that your'e required in conscience to rebuke all evil) and an extreme over-reaction against the laxity of the Conciliars and of the modern world.  We need to find the right balance.  No, we are not required to reprimand or rebuke all sinners.  We are only required to do so if we have authority over them (as the priest at the chapel would), AND if we believe that the rebuke would actuall have the desired effect of correcting the behavior rather than causing the individual to double down, and that reaction can be determined by HOW one does it.  Certain people do not have the right attitude, or even just the right personality ... to properly correct, and the priest should find someone who knows that can do it the right way, without making the place seem like a cult.

    And that goes for other situations too.  I've gone into Trad chapels where the ushers act like SS officers, embarrassing people by telling them they're in the wrong place or violating some kind of etiquette that they had no way ot knowing about, etc. ... and if that's the first impression you get walking into a Traditional chapel for the first time, the chances that you'll return were just reduced by 95%.
    People who dress inappropriately (and who should know better) need to be shamed.

    This does not include newcomers to Tradition.  The OP was not talking about newcomers but established laity who should know better.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 10:40:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • THIS type of garbage is why some people leave Trad chapels after one visit because they think it's a cult.  Snide comments like that absolute are mean and not about "correcting bad behavior".  If you want to correct the behavior, then a lady (not some man) should be designated to very kindly inform the individual, not engage in backbiting sarcastic crap that you pretend is now "charity".  That's just nasty behavior that you're trying to pretend is charity.

    While it's not the priest's job to be fashion police, and generally it's inappropriate for him to do so ... to a point, it's his job to say something, communicate the standards of dress, and if necessary designate some kind lady who could, without coming across nasty as per your advice here, gently offer correction.  After several attempts at correction fail, then other steps should be taken, depending on the gravity of it.

    So, I said it's not the priests' job to be fashion police ... only to a point.  But Canon Law actually requires that a priest refuse the Saraments to those who approach immodestly dressed ... so it's not entirely true.  But, it's also not true that the priest isn't ULTIMATELY responsible, and so he should delegate that responsibility to someone else, not let rogue half-cocked snobs go around making sarcastic comments, giving the place a decidedly cult vibe, and possibly driving people away.

    This quasi-Pharisaical attitude that has infected many Trad groups would seem to be a strange combination of scrupulosity (where you feel that your'e required in conscience to rebuke all evil) and an extreme over-reaction against the laxity of the Conciliars and of the modern world.  We need to find the right balance.  No, we are not required to reprimand or rebuke all sinners.  We are only required to do so if we have authority over them (as the priest at the chapel would), AND if we believe that the rebuke would actuall have the desired effect of correcting the behavior rather than causing the individual to double down, and that reaction can be determined by HOW one does it.  Certain people do not have the right attitude, or even just the right personality ... to properly correct, and the priest should find someone who knows that can do it the right way, without making the place seem like a cult.

    And that goes for other situations too.  I've gone into Trad chapels where the ushers act like SS officers, embarrassing people by telling them they're in the wrong place or violating some kind of etiquette that they had no way ot knowing about, etc. ... and if that's the first impression you get walking into a Traditional chapel for the first time, the chances that you'll return were just reduced by 95%.
    ^^^Exactly.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 10:47:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • THIS type of garbage is why some people leave Trad chapels after one visit because they think it's a cult.  
    You're changing the topic, which is not about a random visitor who dresses immodestly.  The topic is young ladies who are part of the chapel and who dress wrongly.

    Offline Gray2023

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3275
    • Reputation: +1816/-974
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 11:12:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is bad advice.  It's not the priest's job to be fashion police.

    Public shaming should come back.  It's the only thing that works on women.  You see a women dressed inappropriately, you say something like "Wow, didn't know you could dress like that a church." 

    It's not about being mean, it's about correcting bad behavior.  It works.  That's how society used to operate.
    That is interesting that you say that.  I have seen signs that say what is proper to wear.  These signs also tell the people to let the priest handle immodesty issues, so ... I am not sure your advice is right.
    Fatti Maschii, Parole Femine


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #11 on: Yesterday at 11:17:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Haha, thanks for the responses everyone. I was tempted to tell the girls/her parents myself but I decided asking for prudent counsel on CI was a better option. If the girls keep dressing immodestly I will mention it to the priest. They dont always dress like this but if a woman's clothing is too tight it's a problem. 

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33319
    • Reputation: +29618/-613
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #12 on: Yesterday at 11:18:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some women are just inclined to dress as slutty as possible. I was just noticing at my girls' choir performance today, one of the girls had a very short skirt on. Literally everyone else was modestly dressed. They were required to wear black and white clothing (pants and skirts/dresses were allowed). Girls like that end up causing the authorities to have to be super strict and require an actual uniform -- because some girls push the envelope as far as they can.

    Maybe she's an On|yF4ns model -- present or future.

    At my old SSPX chapel there was a girl who dressed very immodestly. Several parishioners gave her trouble, and I don't blame them. Eventually the family left -- and went to a particularly poor-quality Indult group. Based on what we can see on Facebook, it looks like they have PLENTY of problems. The dad was a total beta. A real doormat. Very quiet and soft-spoken. And the wife was very hot-headed, aggressive, strong willed, liberal, etc. A recipe for disaster. They were a large family too. The guy came from a longtime Trad family; the wife was a convert.

    Long story short, dressing like that is just a symptom of pretty serious issues. It is NOT a small matter. Some girls are just broken in the modesty department. Their life is destined for chaos, sadness, despair, and destruction.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #13 on: Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • This quasi-Pharisaical attitude that has infected many Trad groups would seem to be a strange combination of scrupulosity (where you feel that your'e required in conscience to rebuke all evil) and an extreme over-reaction against the laxity of the Conciliars and of the modern world.  We need to find the right balance.  No, we are not required to reprimand or rebuke all sinners.  We are only required to do so if we have authority over them (as the priest at the chapel would), AND if we believe that the rebuke would actuall have the desired effect of correcting the behavior rather than causing the individual to double down, and that reaction can be determined by HOW one does it.  Certain people do not have the right attitude, or even just the right personality ... to properly correct, and the priest should find someone who knows that can do it the right way, without making the place seem like a cult.

    And that goes for other situations too.  I've gone into Trad chapels where the ushers act like SS officers, embarrassing people by telling them they're in the wrong place or violating some kind of etiquette that they had no way ot knowing about, etc. ... and if that's the first impression you get walking into a Traditional chapel for the first time, the chances that you'll return were just reduced by 95%.
    If you don't mind answering, do you think I should rebuke/politely tell people not to use our Lord's name in vain? I'm mainly talking about coworkers/friends/family not random people i happen to pass by on a walk or activity.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33319
    • Reputation: +29618/-613
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Immodest outfits
    « Reply #14 on: Yesterday at 11:24:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • To respond to Ladislaus --

    It really depends on how immodest we're talking. If you're nitpicking, then NO, just shut up and mind your own business.

    But if it's a parishioner who's been going there for a while, she should SEE that everyone else is modest, and YET she is not changing her immodest attire. At some point, it becomes obvious she is determined to greedily harvest attention from males as a resource of sorts. At that point, I think some social shaming is called for. Absolutely social pressure is in order. If the woman doesn't fear God, then social consensus is the only thing some women understand. It used to be socially acceptable to shame things that were shameful, and everything worked well. When you let women do whatever they want, some women will go crazy with it. I suppose that's true with any human being.

    But I agree with Ladislaus, that if the immodesty is serious enough, the priest NEEDS to be brought into the loop. It's his job. If/when he fails to do his job, THEN you move on to the social shaming, firm but polite confrontation, etc.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.