The new-sspx's open-borders policy to letting anyone come into their chapels hasn't worked out. Your approach has failed.
Our Lord took out a whip against those who were dishonoring the temple. An immodestly dressed women is a dishonor to the church, as a place of worship.
Immodesty does not deserve entrance into God's house. God deserves better.
Nobody said open borders, you buffoon. It's making distinctions ... about WHO should enforce it, HOW it should be enforce, making distinctions between egregious violations vs. minor ones, etc.
You guys are what has turned many Trad chapels into cults that nobody wants to come near.
It always boils down to inability to make distinctions, making false dichotomies, making everything an all-or-nothing and black-or-white dichotomy, where it's either "open borders" (let everyone in without distinction) and having some guy ogling every woman who enters and then rudely accosting any who might be even one inch out of compliance. There's no in between for some of you.
It's like when I was criticizing Trump and one individual claimed that hαɾɾιs was therefore my candidate, even though my criticisms of Trump applied to her ten-fold.
That's the strawman by false dichotomy thinking, and even the priests clergy are prey to it, and this error has caused most of the division among Traditional Catholics. It's sad when the very first course priests are supposed to take at seminary is Logic.
Topic: Immodest outfits (Read 31584 times)