Money and trips to Europe.  And pink shirts and ties.

From TIA comments:

What Mr. Voris fails to understand is that an ex-addict of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity cannot be a beacon of orientation on Catholic doctrine in a time of confusion like ours. No one who watches his flamboyant performances can dissociate them from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ of the past thirsty for extravagance and applause. I believe it is too much for him to oblige his viewers to stomach this kind of obnoxious spice in his preaching.

 I am sure that if Mr. Voris were to travel to the present day Vatican and confess his past life there, he would be quickly absolved for what would be considered a “peccadillo.” Perhaps he would even be invited to assume a position in the Roman Curia. But this Vatican staff no longer represents the Catholic Church. And Mr. Voris is well aware of this fact.

 So, my point is: If the “confession” of Mr. Voris were sincere, he should go away, leave the public scene to make penance for his past and avoid causing scandal and confusion. If he continues with his splashy shows, he will never be free of his label of “ex.” He will be doing a disservice to the cause he imagines he is serving.

Someone was recently blacklisted from CMTV.
"Scanner" from Remnant writes:


"Wow. I Just got blacklisted from the comments section at CMTV.
They have their "article" on Monsignor Hugh O'Flaherty. I simply stated "Mons. O'flaherty worked in the Holy Office (today's CDF) and he twice signed, under two popes, the condemnation of the text, devotions and images of the Divine Mercy." That is all I wrote. Those are facts, not opinions. That was enough to get be blacklisted. Incredible."

Quote from: Guest

Someone was recently blacklisted from CMTV.
"Scanner" from Remnant writes:


"Wow. I Just got blacklisted from the comments section at CMTV.
They have their "article" on Monsignor Hugh O'Flaherty. I simply stated "Mons. O'flaherty worked in the Holy Office (today's CDF) and he twice signed, under two popes, the condemnation of the text, devotions and images of the Divine Mercy." That is all I wrote. Those are facts, not opinions. That was enough to get be blacklisted. Incredible."

I can't find these docuмents in a search.  Do you happen to have a link to them?  

I've never cared for Faustina and she has many fanatics running around today.  

Didn't mean to derail the topic.  I have found that most neoCats have no use for facts, especially when those facts topple their sand castles.

http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/divine-mercy-condemned.htm

http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/f072_DivMercy.htm

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Alexandria

Quote from: Guest

Someone was recently blacklisted from CMTV.
"Scanner" from Remnant writes:


"Wow. I Just got blacklisted from the comments section at CMTV.
They have their "article" on Monsignor Hugh O'Flaherty. I simply stated "Mons. O'flaherty worked in the Holy Office (today's CDF) and he twice signed, under two popes, the condemnation of the text, devotions and images of the Divine Mercy." That is all I wrote. Those are facts, not opinions. That was enough to get be blacklisted. Incredible."

I can't find these docuмents in a search.  Do you happen to have a link to them?  

I've never cared for Faustina and she has many fanatics running around today.  

Didn't mean to derail the topic.  I have found that most neoCats have no use for facts, especially when those facts topple their sand castles.

http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/divine-mercy-condemned.htm

http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/f072_DivMercy.htm

Thank you.  The TIA article by Fr. Perez was very good.

I'm looking though to read the actual Vatican docuмents.  I'm assuming that the Acta (if I download it) is all in Latin?  Doesn't help me.  My rudimentary knowledge of Latin would not enable me to translate a docuмent.

Do you happen to know where the actual docuмents are in English?

It's actually in Italian and Latin.

The first condemnation is in Italiano.
The Second, in Latin.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/docuмents/AAS-51-1959-ocr.pdf

In that PDF, scroll down to page 271.
You can copy paste it onto google translator. Here is the text in Italian.

NOTIFICAZIONE
Si rende noto che la Suprema Sacra Congregazione dei Sant'Offizio,
prese in esame le asserite visioni e rivelazioni di Suor Faustina Kowalska,
dell'Istituto di Nostra Signora della Misericordia, defunta nel 1938
presso Cracovia, ha stabilito quanto segue :
1. doversi proibire la diffusione delle immagini e degli scritti che
presentano la devozione della Divina Misericordia nelle forme proposte
dalla medesima Suor Faustina;
2. essere demandato alla prudenza dei Vescovi il compito di rimuovere
le predette immagini, che eventualmente fossero già esposte al
culto.
Dal Palazzo del S. Offizio, 6 marzo 1959.
Ugo O'Flaherty, Notare

Rough Google translation:

NOTIFICATION
Notice is hereby given that the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office ,
He examined the alleged visions and revelations of Sister Faustina Kowalska ,
the Institute of Our Lady of Mercy , deceased in 1938
near Krakow , it held as follows :
1. having to prohibit the dissemination of images and writings belonging to the  devotion of Divine Mercy in the forms proposed
by that Sister Faustina ;
2. be delegated to the prudence of Bishops the task of removing
the above images , which were possibly already exposed cult. (In Churches)

From the Palace of the Holy Office , March 6, 1959 .
Hugh O'Flaherty , Notary

(And here again, that was just the first condemnation)
Of course, "bad translation" is the pretext given as to why it was condemned. And magically pronounced as dogma by a Polish pope...

Looking for a few gαy, err, good men.

Looking for a few gαy, err, good men.

Uh oh, Voris took his shoes off! I wonder which one of those guys has massage duty!

Looking for a few gαy, err, good men.

Just Pause for a moment.