You keep reading in the dark like that and you'll go blind.
It doesn't matter how many times he's lied before, only that he promises that he's telling the truth now. Am I right? I'm not saying a man cannot come back from being an active ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, I'm saying that Voris is an undisputed liar and a severe liability for tradition.
Okay, Croixalist, listen up. Here's what I want you to do.
My blog post (the one that's on page 1 of this thread) is generating high traffic right now. I want you to go on there, to that post, and I want you to post what you're stating right here on Cathinfo.
This will generate the attention of r-selected types--the go-along-get-along Catholics who are trapped in confirmation bias. They will see what you have to say, and you will be sharing this message with a lot of people out there. Do this right away.
It is possible that we might see someone else come along with these suspicions, and that they've been waiting to hear it from someone else. Or, perhaps someone will come along and help you to flush out your thoughts on this matter. Either way, I'd like to see how what you say here stands up to a lot of non-Cathinfo traffic.
In fact, direct people to this very thread, and we can perhaps pull some new traffic to Cathinfo this week. I'm sure Matthew would like that.
Perhaps sharing this with a larger audience will spark something unexpected? Just a thought. But I encourage you to give it a try.
I'd start a new post about this topic, but the main
viral traffic is going to this specific post that I've already put out there.
http://thehirschfiles.blogspot.com/2016/04/i-support-michael-voris-today.htmlIn the meantime--again--I'm open to more discussion about this. That Voris is some kind of a gαy shill who's playing Traditionalists this entire time. If I see more of this kind of talk, I will be further intrigued and compelled to distrust him. In which case, I'll spread the word if that happens.