Does anyone else think that if sedeism is true, Gerry Matatics is right and we should all stay home alone?

no

I think non-homealoner sedes are hypocrites. Their beliefs should lead to home-aloneism, but they only go half-way and still condemn those who are not sedes.

I think non-homealoner sedes are hypocrites. Their beliefs should lead to home-aloneism, but they only go half-way and still condemn those who are not sedes.

Yeah, because they're so blinded by pride that they are "right" they don't realize their hypocrisy.

Does anyone else think that if sedeism is true, Gerry Matatics is right and we should all stay home alone?

Gerry Matatics is a crypto-Jєω.  So is his seminary buddy Scott Hahn

“This is precisely why the Jєωs are the most disastrous people in world history: they have left such a falsified humanity in their wake that even today Christians can think of themselves as anti-Jєωιѕн without understanding that they are the ultimate conclusion of Judaism.”

-Nietzsche

The funny thing about that quote is that it shows just how little Nietzsche understands тαℓмυdic Judaism, which isn't what Christianity is derived from.

Many people stay home-alone because there is no Mass to attend except for the novus ordo.  When you’re poor and can’t drive or are in poor health or elderly, you have to learn to do without.

Define sedism.  Define home-alone.

If you mean there must be a sitting Pope to practice the Faith, and that there isn’t a sitting Pope, so no one can practice the faith, therefore, everyone must stay home-alone….or what do you mean?

Many stay home-alone because there is no Mass, priest, or Sacraments available.  They pray and practice as close to having those things as possible.  But I don’t think that’s what is meant.  

I’m in the latter category.  I’m home-alone because the normal helps of the Church are unavailable to me, status of the Pope notwithstanding.