I talked to a high degree freemason... I won't even say what degree (there are 180 degrees) and he went to a very exclusive school. Some SSPX people went to this school, and he was told to beat the crap out of those kids, and taught to hate them.

He also told me that the Freemasons are no longer concerned about the SSPX. The reason they were really against them in the first place was because they were "trying to steal a religion from them." The fact that they're "no longer concerned" about them anymore, speaks volumes.

The Resistance is on the right track. The SSPX has been hijacked.

Yes, well, I talked to a super super high degree Freemason the other day (there's 360 degrees), and he said that they were collaborating with Obama to engineer the Three Days of Darkness as quickly as possible.  

Should be up on Infowars any day now.

When teaching my son how to drive, we drove around a parking lot of a novus ordo church and one of the cars had "Master Mason" on the license plate.  I explained to my son how the freemasons are an enemy group and that the Catholic Church is opposed to them.  

The novus ordo, on the other hand, could care less about truth - it seeks to make peace with governments for whatever reason.  

When teaching my son how to drive, we drove around a parking lot of a novus ordo church and one of the cars had "Master Mason" on the license plate.  I explained to my son how the freemasons are an enemy group and that the Catholic Church is opposed to them.  

The novus ordo, on the other hand, could care less about truth - it seeks to make peace with governments for whatever reason.  

He said an immediate family member of his considered himself a 'devout catholic' when he knew darn well that he wasn't at all, and he wasn't fooling anyone. Another of his immediate relatives is in the female section of the freemasons (not sure if eastern star or what) but has a super mysterious title (I really wish I could say but I don't want anyone to find out who I am talking to, not here, but them) and was also 'catholic.' Has a pic of a really sinister pope of last century (try to figure out who) hanging somewhere in her house.

If you knew who this was, you might not casually dismiss what I'm saying. Really I wish I could be candid about this, but considering what info I'm trying to get right now, it's pretty important I don't say much more about it until I find out what info I want.

I still don't believe anything the OP is saying.

 :scared2: The SSPX... taken by Masons?

I want to tell you what I found out about one of them, but with the reaction I've received in this thread, you wouldn't believe me anyway. One of the names I had looked up, is in fact, a Freemason. I am not going to go into detail about degrees or anything, but I know he is, and he's in Bishop Fellay's circle of confidants. That's all I will say about it. I'm out of this thread, and will leave you only with this.

From a Cathinfo thread (it won't show up because anonymous posting) How-to-spot-a-web-forum-AGENT-disinformation-techniques

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sɛҳuąƖ deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

I don't think you are any of those things.  I just think you are a liar.

The resistance is going to have infiltrators too. You always must be on your guard.

I cannot affirm anything, but I believe that the resistance has already been infiltrated. It is important to remember that all traditionalist movements are targeted from the very beginning by Masons. They prefer not to arrive late and then try to move up the ranks. They have to get their guy in from the very foundation of the group and try to worm him to the top. After they get him to the top they can infiltrate the entire group in every position and subvert completely the group and it's goals.

It is nice to use a point of reference. Let's look at the Campos priests. They were founded in complete Catholic orthodoxy. From the beginning there was a priest making a lot of noise. He somehow seemed to make himself the "spokesman" of the Campos priest. He was fierce in his defense of the Catholic Faith. He always seemed to find a way into the limelight also. He was always the one speaking and affirming Traditional Catholic tradition. When Bishop De Castro Mayer died, there were two priests of whom he had selected to be a bishop and replace him, neither were the priest who became the spokesman of the Campos priests, notably.

Unfortunately, Bishop De Castro Mayer passed away. Not long after, Bishop Rangel, personally selected by Bishop De Castro Mayer, became terminally ill with cancer   :scratchchin: Interestingly, Bishop Rangel made the deal. Bishop Rangel did not give up his stand against the Council. It was Bishop Rifan who was consecrated bishop and then subsequently changed the official position of the Campos priests and accepted the "Hermaneutic of Continuity" as the official position of the Campos priests, although this change of the position was never required by Rome.

Not long after, Bishop Rifan attended several liturgical scandals and innovations, changed the Mass of the Campos priests to include hymns of Marxism and Portuguese responses for a diologue Mass.

The self-declared spokesman and ambitious traditionalist priest of the Union of priests formed in Campos by Bishop De Castro Mayer was non other than the notorious modernist Bshop Rifan, who today sends people to doubtful Masses with consecrations using "for many" and has officially accepted the errors of Vatican 2 while destroying the works of Bishop De Castro Mayer singlehandedly.

This should be a lesson to the resistance that we should never forget.