One Fullerton priest is a perv, the other is head of the sspx USA.
One Vanderputten is a perv, the other is still a priest in the sspx.
One Pfeiffer runs a "seminary" with a warlock, the other is still a priest in the sspx.
What exactly are you trying to imply here?
Two men from the same family become priests and one of them goes off the rails, what you get is one priest off the rails. What do you want, both of them to be off the rails?
Or are you implying that one from each of the Novak, Kimball and Haynos families are off the rails?
Also some corrections. To the best of my knowledge, Fr. Dan Fullerton was not accused of any perversity. He was last I knew a military chaplain and I don't think rank-and-file military would put up with that. Calling him a perv seems like textbook rash judgment. Fr. Angelo VDP is with the FSSP, to the best of my knowledge. Fr. Joe Pfeiffer had signs of trouble well before he was ordained; I thought it clear he wouldn't last in a structured organization. Fr. Benedict VDP also had
a big red flag - he had his sermons recorded and disseminated because he thought he had a unique message to deliver. Pride tends to block the graces needed to avoid other problems.