Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr Taouk on voting  (Read 7141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Fr Taouk on voting
« Reply #35 on: May 14, 2019, 02:08:07 PM »
Quote
To me, if voting for my uncle is permitted, then not voting at all is also permitted ... because it has the same effect, at the end of the day.
It depends.  Usually when you go to vote, you have many, many races to vote on.  If you voted for your Uncle in a race that had 2 mediocre/bad candidates, this is understandable.  If you voted for your uncle when there was a legitimately good candidate, that's wrong.  If you voted for your uncle in every race, I agree, you might as well have stayed at home. 
.
But voting is more than just one race.  Voting is much more than just governor or president or US congress.  Judges, sheriffs, local city officials - these have NOTHING to do with abortion or national issues.  But they do affect your local city and one has an obligation, both of charity and justice, to 1) help their neighbor by taking care of one's city, 2) to elect officials that will uphold and enforce (and pass good) laws.
.
The Constitution might give you the "freedom" to not participate in voting, but I think Catholic principles says you have an obligation to be responsible and a leader in local government (at least).  Voting for a few hrs every 2 years is the bare minimum of "civic duty".  If you don't take part in it, and you don't think anyone else has to take part in it, then a person has NO RIGHT to complain about ANY law that goes into effect. 

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Fr Taouk on voting
« Reply #36 on: May 14, 2019, 02:23:41 PM »
If voting had any meaning the Jews wouldn't allow it.


Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Fr Taouk on voting
« Reply #37 on: May 14, 2019, 02:51:14 PM »

Quote
If voting had any meaning the Jews wouldn't allow it.
This is true for some races but not all.  Don’t overestimate the power of the devil or his minions.  Don’t underestimate the power of prayer, hard work and Divine intervention.  We are the “Church Militant” and we have to keep fighting.  If the joos were as in control as you think, we’d have had WW3 by now and we’d all be incinerated by nukes or in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs.  

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Fr Taouk on voting
« Reply #38 on: May 14, 2019, 03:06:44 PM »

ISIS used US missile strike to launch new offensive near Palmyra, Homs governor tells RT

https://www.rt.com/news/383826-isis-used-us-airstrike-syria/


ISIL takes advantage of US attack on government to storm western Palmyra

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/isil-takes-advantage-us-attack-government-storm-western-palmyra/


Maillot Jaune

1. Even if we are to trust those questionable sources, they only had a couple sentences each! And all they said was an offensive was launched by ISIS. Guess what? They weren't successful -- at all! It was a TRAP. It was a trap to draw them out and get them excited and over-confident.

It's been a couple years, but I remember that now. ISIS was watching the MSM like everyone else and they fell for it. They really thought Trump was entering the war on their side (against the Syrian gov't) -- but they were fooled. Did they gain a single foot of territory? No, actually they lost ground and had their butts handed to them. The proof is in the pudding, boys and girls.

2. We don't know what the "Syrian base" in question actually was.

3. The facts speak for themselves. This news was 2 years ago. Did ISIS succeed with any of its new "offensives"? Did Trump follow up with ANY military activity whatsoever afterwards? Is the United States a very powerful country, among other countries in the world? Does the USA have the military power to do more than fire 59 missiles at Syria?

4. If the USA was still on the side of the "rebels"/ISIS/ISIL/Islamic State, they would still be in control of Syria like they were before Trump showed up. The actions of the last 2 years speak for themselves.

5. I never said there wasn't any confusion, noise, or fog of war. What I'm saying is that you have to look at the DEEDS and ACTIONS, not at the individual tweets or news stories. You have to use your brain and string it all together.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Fr Taouk on voting
« Reply #39 on: May 14, 2019, 03:10:08 PM »
If voting had any meaning the Jews wouldn't allow it.
They have some power, yes, but they're not invincible or all-powerful.
In fact, they only have power insofar as the Gentiles are apostate from God.
Matthew