Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Fr. Laisneys response to a letter of Fr. Chazal  (Read 688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Fr. Laisneys response to a letter of Fr. Chazal
« on: April 19, 2013, 12:42:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Fr. Laisneys response to a letter of Fr. Chazal
    « Reply #1 on: April 19, 2013, 04:57:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Fr. Laisney won't quit, it seems.

    But guess what, Father? Neither will the Resistance!
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Fr. Laisneys response to a letter of Fr. Chazal
    « Reply #2 on: April 20, 2013, 03:04:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Guess what?
    It seemed that Fr. Laisney was banned from India after some neo-sspxier questioned Fr. Couture about Fr. Liasney 'commanding' the faithful to attend the Indult Mess of the NO church and on one occasion Fr. Laisney did actually assisted in the Indult Mess by singing. It was a requiem mess. There was a 'little uproar' hence the decision of the ban. Maybe Fr. Salvador can do better?? :scratchchin:

    Come to wonder WHY? Fr. Laisney never apologies to Tradition In Action for falsely accusing TIA of being Sedivacantes? Certainly not a manly thing to do.  :scratchchin:
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Fr. Laisneys response to a letter of Fr. Chazal
    « Reply #3 on: April 20, 2013, 09:26:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Which indult mass and when? I can't wait for a response from Fr. Chazal.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Fr. Laisneys response to a letter of Fr. Chazal
    « Reply #4 on: April 28, 2013, 04:03:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Laisney really has a dark side: he really is a willing tool of Fellay.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »