Author Topic: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX  (Read 1857 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
« on: July 24, 2019, 05:57:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why some conciliar priests suddenly “discover Tradition:”

    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/is-the-sspx-sheltering-a-sɛҳuąƖ-predator

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #1 on: July 24, 2019, 06:10:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As disgusting as this is, the docs attached to the CM article show the fornication was with a consenting adult (did not happen until she was 19).

    Completely unacceptable and gravely scandalous, but not with a minor, and not ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.

    The SSPX can expect much more of this once it enters the mainstream church.

    The main takeaway in this story is to be wary of conciliar priests approaching the SSPX and Resistance.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #2 on: July 24, 2019, 06:18:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Unfortunately the Resistance (of all allegiances) is in no position to throw stones at the SSPX, as several deplorable examples have sought to infiltrate their environs (some after receiving their walking papers from the SSPX, and some from the dioceses).

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #3 on: July 24, 2019, 07:58:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8662
    • Reputation: +6225/-1870
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #4 on: July 24, 2019, 08:15:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The SSPX issued a response to the Church Militant article today: https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/press-release-concerning-church-militant-article-regarding-sspx-49433
    I would call that a compelling rebuttal by the SSPX.
    How will Church Militant react?
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #5 on: July 24, 2019, 09:16:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would call that a compelling rebuttal by the SSPX.
    How will Church Militant react?
    Aside from that, so far as I am aware, Fr. McLucas has never been properly ordained.
    That alone should have been reason enough to keep him out of SSPX chapels.

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1086/-2220
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #6 on: July 24, 2019, 09:56:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Pretty sad, unfortunately the sɛҳuąƖ abuse extends to traditionalists. Since it isn't the Novus Ordo that is the necessary cause of pedophile priests (because SSPX priests are also guilty of this) I wonder what is the cause of it.
    Many pedophile priests were ordained pre-V2. They were likely part of Bella Dodd's cօռspιʀαcʏ of Communist infiltration, but most of them were ordained pre-V2.
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #7 on: July 24, 2019, 10:09:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0



  • You know something...

    I don't listen to anything Michael Voris, the ex-homo, Opus dei operative says.



    Of all the scandal the SSPX is reaping, this one I'd let fly because Voris is reporting it.



    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #8 on: July 24, 2019, 11:03:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr McLucas was counseling this girl upon the request of the parents for years. She obviously had psychological issues. Like the SSPX article stated, this was an accusation only, not a conviction of any crime. Attorney General ((Shapiro)) of Pennsylvania published an ACCUSATION against Fr McLucas in the Pennsylvania report- this alone should have been illegal.If we accept every unverified  accusation against a priest, and if a priest is guilty until proven innocent, what's to stop anyone from accusing ANY priest if they think they can get a few shekels out of it?
    Fr McLucas faculties were removed By Cardinal Egan  ( and reinstated by Cardinal Dolan)after he wrote the essay "The Emasculation of the Priesthood"(It's online) in the '90's, He was never given a reason for by Egan for this punitive action.He has suffered much in the hands of the Novus Ordo.
    I can only hope that the SSPX has conditionally ordained him as I think he would be a blessing to them.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #9 on: July 25, 2019, 12:44:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr McLucas was counseling this girl upon the request of the parents for years. She obviously had psychological issues. Like the SSPX article stated, this was an accusation only, not a conviction of any crime. 
    Parents who take their girls to psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and even priests, should be with them or just outside of the door all of the time. Priests are men and young girls are a natural attraction to all men no matter the age. I have seen girls as young as 12 years old that are full grown women, these parents were very naïve to leave this girl alone with this priest for such long periods of time.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #10 on: July 25, 2019, 12:44:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Parents who take their girls to psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and even priests, should be with them or just outside of the door all of the time. Priests are men and young girls are a natural attraction to all men no matter the age of the man. I have seen girls as young as 12 years old that are full grown women, these parents were very naïve to leave this girl alone with this priest for such long periods of time.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4934
    • Reputation: +2547/-959
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #11 on: July 25, 2019, 12:45:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr McLucas was counseling this girl upon the request of the parents for years. She obviously had psychological issues. Like the SSPX article stated, this was an accusation only, not a conviction of any crime. Attorney General ((Shapiro)) of Pennsylvania published an ACCUSATION against Fr McLucas in the Pennsylvania report- this alone should have been illegal.If we accept every unverified  accusation against a priest, and if a priest is guilty until proven innocent, what's to stop anyone from accusing ANY priest if they think they can get a few shekels out of it?
    Fr McLucas faculties were removed By Cardinal Egan  ( and reinstated by Cardinal Dolan)after he wrote the essay "The Emasculation of the Priesthood"(It's online) in the '90's, He was never given a reason for by Egan for this punitive action.He has suffered much in the hands of the Novus Ordo.
    I can only hope that the SSPX has conditionally ordained him as I think he would be a blessing to them.
    Parents who take their girls to psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and even priests, should be with them or just outside of the door all of the time. Priests are men and young girls are a natural attraction to all men no matter the age of the man. I have seen girls as young as 12 years old that are full grown women, these parents were very naïve to leave this girl alone with this priest for such long periods of time.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #12 on: July 25, 2019, 06:08:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He has not been conditionally ordained.

    That would be against modernist Rome, you see.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #13 on: July 25, 2019, 07:18:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • CM responds to SSPX article with a couple good arguments of its own:

    1) Fr. McLucas has never denied the alley;

    2) Fr. McLucas was never convicted because he settled out of court before the case could be tried on the merits.

    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/sspx-defends-sɛҳuąƖ-predator-in-its-ranks

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Fr. James McLucas and the SSPX
    « Reply #14 on: July 25, 2019, 07:32:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :popcorn:


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16