Being a "Resistance kid" doesn't bullet-proof you from sophistry (particularly sophistry which appears to have the approbation of the SSPX, which may no longer oppose the sophistries of the planetarium staff).  Which is another way of saying, "he who loves danger shall perish in it."  You don't willfully put yourself into occasions against the faith.  Your earlier response to this teaching of Catholic moral theology was moronic: "It is only an intellectual occasion," as though that somehow made it less real.  Satan knows legions millions (billions?) of souls have fallen into hell on the basis of intellectual error (i.e., heresy).  

Why not simply restate you are not yet fully Catholic, and therefore see exactly eye to eye with the neo-SSPX?

First off, if you want to be a jerk, at least use your forum name instead of hiding behind anonymity like a coward.  Come on.

I'm a catechumen.  I've been up front about this.  I believe in every single dogma of the Catholic Church, thus I am "fully Catholic."  I have admitted before that I do not constitute a fully traditional Catholic by the standards of this forum.  I have traditional leanings.  I admire Lefebvre.  I probably am more close to the "Neo-SSPX" than the SSPX Resistance all things considered, but I also don't go on an SSPX Resistance board to trash the SSPX Resistance, 'cause that would be majorly majorly counter productive.  I don't hide where I stand, but neither do I feel like coming on to pick fights for no reason.

I wasn't saying an intellectual occasion isn't real, but it seems like more the sort of thing that can be countered with sound reasoning, rather than needing to shelter from the objection outright.