Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Anσnymσus Posts Allowed => Topic started by: Marcelino on April 12, 2012, 11:56:48 PM

Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Marcelino on April 12, 2012, 11:56:48 PM
Quote from: Guest
The neocon National Review has fired John Derbyshire for speaking the truth about blacks. First see this in the paleocon Chronicles:

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2012/04/09/johnny-they-hardly-knew-ye/

Now, the article:

http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire

Follow-up:

http://takimag.com/article/talking_back_john_derbyshire




none of your links worked!  

Here's the article

http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire/print#axzz1rtJuddue

and here's his follow up to it

http://takimag.com/article/talking_back_john_derbyshire/print#axzz1rtOtSsed

Oh and that other thing you posted

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2012/04/09/johnny-they-hardly-knew-ye/


John Derbyshire's article is hillarious!  I am so bored with that topic, but he made it fun again!  Totally worth reading.   :laugh1:
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Marcelino on April 12, 2012, 11:59:57 PM
John Derbyshire mug shots   :laugh1:
(http://www.johnderbyshire.com/mugshot.jpg)
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Alex on April 13, 2012, 12:36:18 AM
In the 90's, I used to walk in south central (the "hood") in the middle of the night and the blacks didn't even do anything to me. Either "ghetto" blacks are not as dangerous as they are made out to be, or they all thought I was an undercover cop since it was a strange site seeing a white girl all by herself in the hood, or else my guardian angel was protecting me and made them oblivious to me. There was even blacks shooting at other blacks near me in a drive by and they weren't even concerned with my presence. And the 90's had more racial tension then now I think.
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Marcelino on April 13, 2012, 12:43:03 AM
Quote from: Alex
In the 90's, I used to walk in south central (the "hood") in the middle of the night and the blacks didn't even do anything to me. Either "ghetto" blacks are not as dangerous as they are made out to be, or they all thought I was an undercover cop since it was a strange site seeing a white girl all by herself in the hood, or else my guardian angel was protecting me and made them oblivious to me. There was even blacks shooting at other blacks near me in a drive by and they weren't even concerned with my presence. And the 90's had more racial tension then now I think.


That's one of the weird things about neighborhoods like that.  They're just like any place else.  Sun rises and sets, the birds sing, the rain falls and people go about the daily business of living.  

Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Alex on April 14, 2012, 06:14:45 AM
Quote from: Guest
Quote from: Alex
In the 90's, I used to walk in south central (the "hood") in the middle of the night and the blacks didn't even do anything to me. Either "ghetto" blacks are not as dangerous as they are made out to be, or they all thought I was an undercover cop since it was a strange site seeing a white girl all by herself in the hood, or else my guardian angel was protecting me and made them oblivious to me. There was even blacks shooting at other blacks near me in a drive by and they weren't even concerned with my presence. And the 90's had more racial tension then now I think.


There are many dangerous things that people do.  Do such a thing once too often and you might well be very sorry.

Not all black neighborhoods are particularly dangerous.  But you would be very foolish indeed to go wandering about at night alone in them.



Yes. I did many foolish and dangerous things in my 20's. I think it was my guardian angel that protected me and made me almost "invisible" in the hood all alone all those times - as I was protected in many other life threatening situations back then. I wouldn't suggest anyone doing what I did by going to a black ghetto at night. Then again...going to any ghetto, such as a Hispanic ghetto, is not too wise either.
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Alex on April 14, 2012, 06:26:16 AM
To tell you the truth, I think Hispanic ghettos are more dangerous then the black ones.
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Sigismund on April 14, 2012, 10:33:40 PM
Quote from: Guest
Can anyone name one black city that is both clean and safe? Any country is fine.


Can you name a white city that is clean and safe?  Or, how about just naming a white city?
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Sigismund on April 15, 2012, 12:35:10 AM
Quote from: Guest
Quote from: Sigismund
Quote from: Guest
Can anyone name one black city that is both clean and safe? Any country is fine.


Can you name a white city that is clean and safe?  Or, how about just naming a white city?


Boise, Idaho
Lincoln, Nebraska
Fargo, North Dakota
Henderson, Nevada
Spokane, Washington
Kenosha, Wisconsin
Duluth, Minnesota
Billings, Montana
Montpelier, Vermont
Cranston, Rhode Island

Liberal fool.  :rolleyes:


So, no black, Hispanic, or Asian people live in these cities?  None of them have ethnic, non-white neighborhoods?  Crime does not exist there?
Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Marcelino on April 19, 2012, 11:45:01 PM

If blacks commit a whole lot more violent crime than whites do, does that make blacks racially inferior to whites?  In other words, is racial equality only possible if we ignore certain "inconvenient" truths?  


Title: Fired for speaking the truth
Post by: Marcelino on April 19, 2012, 11:47:49 PM
Why is it that our only two choices seem to be:  

Blacks are 100% equal to whites

or

Blacks are basically "ape men."  

Could it be that somebody dishonest is framing the debate?