Author Topic: Feminism of Men (Read 6457 times)

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #15 on:** December 08, 2014, 04:06:39 PM »

Quote from: ggreg

Posting your opinions anonymously is hardly masculine.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #16 on:** December 08, 2014, 04:48:54 PM »

Quote from: Guest

It is a disgrace that women and little girls are cutting their hair short like men. Then there are men and young boys who have hair like girls.

Dahhhh....what's the difference?? 2000 years ago both men and women had long hair. Now both men and women have short hair. Why pick on just women?

Women may have cut their hair BUT men not only cut their hair they scraped the hair off their face !

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #17 on:** December 08, 2014, 06:55:49 PM »

I don't think men with long hair are effeminate. I like long hair men and they can be very manly.

PereJoseph · « **Reply #18 on:** December 09, 2014, 03:43:23 PM »

Quote from: PereJoseph

Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: Guest
It would certainly help if "they" stopped putting female hormones in our food.

Little girls also would not be going through puberty at 7 years old.

This strikes me as an overly materialistic assessment.

While hormones might account for purely biological phenomena like precocious puberty, I would reject any notion of hormones having the ability to incline a person to any particular vice. On that path lie other materialistic exculpations for sodomy and effeminacy like the falsehoods of the "gαy gene" and "born this way" sloganeers.

Effeminacy is a vice, plain and simple. Cultural movements have a far more tangible effect on darkening intellects and inclining people to particular vices than mere chemicals do. Effeminacy and sodomy were rampant during the Renaissance and also among the ancient Greeks and Persians; peoples whom we can safely assume did not have excessive amounts of soy or artificially estrogen-rich beef on their menus.

Good post. Makes me wish I had a tankard of ale to clunk on the table approvingly.

I was inexplicably down-thumbed for this. Who doesn't like ale ?

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #19 on:** December 09, 2014, 05:14:07 PM »

Little boys with long hair is weird. Boys need to dress and act like boys.

Real men don't wear pink ties or shirts for breast cancer.
Go to Mass and pray for those with cancer. Wear a small tie or hat pin instead. But don't cave in to feminism.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #20 on:** December 09, 2014, 05:15:32 PM »

:cheers:

Ale is good.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #21 on:** December 09, 2014, 05:18:53 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest

It is a disgrace that women and little girls are cutting their hair short like men. Then there are men and young boys who have hair like girls.

Dahhhh....what's the difference?? 2000 years ago both men and women had long hair. Now both men and women have short hair. Why pick on just women? You need it again.

Women may have cut their hair BUT men not only cut their hair they scraped the hair off their face !

Women should have long hair. Men should have short hair.

:alcohol: :cheers:

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #22 on:** December 09, 2014, 05:22:37 PM »

Men need to man up and be masculine instead of femmy girly girly men.
Women need to act and look like women instead of butch.

ggreg · « **Reply #23 on:** December 09, 2014, 05:31:44 PM »

Quote from: Guest

I don't think men with long hair are effeminate. I like long hair men and they can be very manly.

It's certainly very manely.

What do you think of the Gollum look?

BTNYC · « **Reply #24 on:** December 09, 2014, 07:16:59 PM »

Quote from: PereJoseph

Quote from: PereJoseph
Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: Guest
It would certainly help if "they" stopped putting female hormones in our food.

Little girls also would not be going through puberty at 7 years old.

This strikes me as an overly materialistic assessment.

While hormones might account for purely biological phenomena like precocious puberty, I would reject any notion of hormones having the ability to incline a person to any particular vice. On that path lie other materialistic exculpations for sodomy and effeminacy like the falsehoods of the "gαy gene" and "born this way" sloganeers.

Effeminacy is a vice, plain and simple. Cultural movements have a far more tangible effect on darkening intellects and inclining people to particular vices than mere chemicals do. Effeminacy and sodomy were rampant during the Renaissance and also among the ancient Greeks and Persians; peoples whom we can safely assume did not have excessive amounts of soy or artificially estrogen-rich beef on their menus.

Good post. Makes me wish I had a tankard of ale to clunk on the table approvingly.

I was inexplicably down-thumbed for this. Who doesn't like ale ?

Presumably one of the two anonymous materialists who disliked my refusal to coddle femmes and fαɢs by writing off their vices as the unavoidable effects of the magickal elixer of estrogen on the (apparently) easily programmable machine that is man.

In any case, I raise my own tankard to you, PereJoseph, and quaff to your health with thanks to Almighty God for the gift of ale.

BTNYC · « **Reply #25 on:** December 09, 2014, 07:29:17 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest

It is a disgrace that women and little girls are cutting their hair short like men. Then there are men and young boys who have hair like girls.

Dahhhh....what's the difference?? 2000 years ago both men and women had long hair. Now both men and women have short hair. Why pick on just women?

Women may have cut their hair BUT men not only cut their hair they scraped the hair off their face !

2000 years ago St. Paul said that long hair was a glory for a woman, but dishonorable for a man. While Our Lord, for example, had hair that was "long" by modern standards, it was of a perfectly masculine short length for His day and culture (shoulder length). "Long hair," of the kind worn by women, would have been down the whole length of the back.

Apart from the Mosaic laws abrogated by Christ, Scripture is silent on the liceity of beard shaving. However, since shaving of the face has been a traditional discipline for clerics in the West for well over a millennium, we may not disparage so venerable a practice by equating it with the modern practice of women chopping their hair to mannish lengths, nor men growing theirs to effeminate lengths.

But as for me, I am a layman, and am thankful to God for the gloriously full beard He has seen fit to give me, which happily grows richer with venerable gray hairs with each passing year.

BTNYC · « **Reply #26 on:** December 09, 2014, 07:48:36 PM »

Quote from: PereJoseph

Quote from: PereJoseph
Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: Guest
It would certainly help if "they" stopped putting female hormones in our food.

Little girls also would not be going through puberty at 7 years old.

This strikes me as an overly materialistic assessment.

While hormones might account for purely biological phenomena like precocious puberty, I would reject any notion of hormones having the ability to incline a person to any particular vice. On that path lie other materialistic exculpations for sodomy and effeminacy like the falsehoods of the "gαy gene" and "born this way" sloganeers.

Effeminacy is a vice, plain and simple. Cultural movements have a far more tangible effect on darkening intellects and inclining people to particular vices than mere chemicals do. Effeminacy and sodomy were rampant during the Renaissance and also among the ancient Greeks and Persians; peoples whom we can safely assume did not have excessive amounts of soy or artificially estrogen-rich beef on their menus.

Good post. Makes me wish I had a tankard of ale to clunk on the table approvingly.

I was inexplicably down-thumbed for this. Who doesn't like ale ?

I stumbled upon this clue to the presumptive answer to your question in, of all places, the "Morality of Snitching" thread in the General Discussion forum (not that such silly, irrational acrimony is any less inexplicable):

Quote from: claudel

Congratulations, ggreg. This is a provocative moral topic—for a change—and it has already generated some interesting and thoughtful responses, whether one agrees with them or not. The comments here certainly beat the pants off the comments in the Feminism of Men thread, where guys are congratulating one another on how manly they are, on how much they despise long hair and the color pink, and on how much they like to drink. Indeed, readers could do far worse than make it a rule of thumb that any thread where the word "tankard" appears is a thread worth ignoring.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #27 on:** December 10, 2014, 12:18:36 AM »

Quote from: Guest

I don't think men with long hair are effeminate. I like long hair men and they can be very manly.

Hello, guest, you know, the three bozos who thumbed you down must think Jesus Christ looks "effeminate", too, for their warped view is that long hair on men is de facto "effeminate", so this means they view Christ and the Apostles as "effeminate", but this prejudice is more than likely due to envy of men with full, long hair. Moreover, they conceal their envy by labeling men with long hair as "effeminate", thereby elevating themselves (in their deluded minds) above another men who are genetically blessed with healthy enough follicles to grow long hair. In other words, these potato heads suffer, more or less, from low self esteem. :dancing:

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #28 on:** December 10, 2014, 12:26:00 AM »

Quote from: ascent

Quote from: Guest
I don't think men with long hair are effeminate. I like long hair men and they can be very manly.

Hello, guest, you know, the three bozos who thumbed you down must think Jesus Christ looks "effeminate", too, for their warped view is that long hair on men is de facto "effeminate", so this means they view Christ and the Apostles as "effeminate", but this prejudice is more than likely due to envy of men with full, long hair. Moreover, they conceal their envy by labeling men with long hair as "effeminate", thereby elevating themselves (in their deluded minds) above another men who are genetically blessed with healthy enough follicles to grow long hair. In other words, these potato heads suffer, more or less, from low self esteem. :dancing:

Yes, this is true :rahrah:

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #29 on:** December 10, 2014, 11:00:18 AM »

Quote from: BTNYC

2000 years ago St. Paul said that long hair was a glory for a woman, but dishonorable for a man. While Our Lord, for example, had hair that was "long" by modern standards, it was of a perfectly masculine short length for His day and culture (shoulder length). "Long hair," of the kind worn by women, would have been down the whole length of the back.

I disagree with this statement. It is evident that Jesus did in fact have long hair, very distinguishable from the very short clean cut roman style. There have always been manly men with long hair: warriors, kings, knights, and saints and they have been definitely not effeminate.

Author Topic: Feminism of Men (Read 6457 times)

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus