Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Author Topic: Father Fewell  (Read 21423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Father Fewell
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2024, 06:13:52 PM »
We received direct confirmation from Saint Isidore's that a canonical review was performed by the SSPX and it was decided NOT to perform a conditional ordination.
Logged

Offline ElwinRansom1970

  • Supporter
Re: Father Fewell
« Reply #16 on: June 05, 2024, 06:26:00 PM »
Quote from: Änσnymσus on June 05, 2024, 04:59:01 PM
Can you cite something from the SSPX or Archbishop Lefebvre that backs up what you're saying?
Better! I was a seminarian in the late 1980s. I was there at Winona and this was my own personal experience. Bishop Williamson conditionally confirmed all seminarians who had been confirmed in the Novus Ordo. A few years earlier, Archbishop Lefebvre had done the same at Ridgefield.

Were you associated with the SSPX five, four, even three decades ago?
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Father Fewell
« Reply #17 on: June 05, 2024, 06:29:21 PM »
Quote from: ElwinRansom1970 on June 05, 2024, 06:26:00 PM
Better! I was a seminarian in the late 1980s. I was there at Winona and this was my own personal experience. Bishop Williamson conditionally confirmed all seminarians who had been confirmed in the Novus Ordo. A few years earlier, Archbishop Lefebvre had done the same at Ridgefield.

Were you associated with the SSPX five, four, even three decades ago?

No, it's not better. I'm asking about an official policy for the SSPX, or a quote from +ABL. Not a personal experience. 
Logged

Offline ElwinRansom1970

  • Supporter
Re: Father Fewell
« Reply #18 on: June 05, 2024, 06:33:55 PM »
Quote from: Änσnymσus on June 05, 2024, 06:29:21 PM
No, it's not better. I'm asking about an official policy for the SSPX, or a quote from +ABL. Not a personal experience.
Yes, this was the OFFICIAL policy at St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary. You clearly had no connection to the Society in those days or you would know this. Plus, you what a written policy or statement. That was not how things worked back then. 🤦‍♂️

I suspect that were thd SSPX is return to the behaviours and attitudes of its priests, seminarians, religious, and laity as they were in the 1980s, you would speed off to the FSSP or ICK.
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Father Fewell
« Reply #19 on: June 05, 2024, 06:45:04 PM »
Quote from: ElwinRansom1970 on June 05, 2024, 06:33:55 PM
Yes, this was the OFFICIAL policy at St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary. You clearly had no connection to the Society in those days or you would know this. Plus, you what a written policy or statement. That was not how things worked back then. 🤦‍♂️

I suspect that were thd SSPX is return to the behaviours and attitudes of its priests, seminarians, religious, and laity as they were in the 1980s, you would speed off to the FSSP or ICK.

So, personal experience from someone on a forum is always better than an official policy. Sounds very Vatican ll. 

You want to make it about individual persons. I'm not interested in that. This isn't high school. 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
« previous next »