It really makes a person wonder what the true motives are.

Is there some chance it has an occult significance?

I feel like this is going to grow in popularity amongst women of means. She could have hypochondria, or maybe just control issues and figures if she's going to lose a part of her, it might as well be on her own terms.

She is also rumored to have her ovaries removed. I find this more troubling, by far. I do not support formula, but it is a viable way of feeding a child in extreme circuмstance, whereas removing one's ovaries is not a viable way of reproducing.

Twenty years ago it was hysterectomies it seems like medical things go in fads. Half of American suburban housewives with money to burn at the health food store developed a wheat allergy recently.

It strikes me as in violation of the Principle of Totality to remove parts that are not yet, and may never be, diseased.

But, maybe it is permissible to pre-empt a disease you think you have a good chance of getting?

I am very much against this type of "preventative" measure.  My mother was diagnosed with breast cancer when she was 43 years old, and passed away at age 46 1/2.  I have not, and will not be tested to see if I have this gene that supposedly predicts the likelihood of contracting cancer.  What we don't know and what this actress likely was never told, is about the link between birth control pills, abortion and breast cancer.  THESE things are what is behind the epidemic of breast cancer.  Ovarian cancer is caused by STD(s).  I doubt very much that when the actress was being tested and talked to about risk factors that these issues ever reached the light of day.

I've also heard about women who've been diagnosed with cancer after the mastectomies.  It's not impossible for cancer to happen regardless of breast tissue being removed.

  I'm having myself lobotomized in case I go insane.    

It really makes a person wonder what the true motives are.

Is there some chance it has an occult significance?

Yes, it does.

She is a "role model" that "should" be imitated by other women.

I'll try to explain myself...

There are certain people, who are super-famous, that are used for brainwashing the masses.

Some of those people, who are super-famous, are puppets.

What kind of puppets?

In former times they were known as "fakirs". The Bible uses the term "enchanters" or "charmers" for those who make "fakirs" out of otherwise "normal people".

There are a lot of "famous fakirs" these days...

Britney Spears, Anna Nichole Smith, Michael Jackson, Mel Gibson, etc...

Each one of them is used as a "role model" that must push a segment of society towards a particular direction.

But what is the "message" that is being currently broadcast through Angelina Jolie?

Perhaps that people should self-mutilate themselves.

There are already handicapped people who mutilate parts of their bodies, such as a hand, in order to have them replaced by cybernetic replacement parts. The term for that is "selective amputation".

In a case like that, a person gets rid of the hand that God gave Him/Her because He/She can't move it in order to have it replaced with a Cybernetic replacement that would move using a BMI (Brain Machine Interface). That is, to reject what God gave you, and change it for what man offers you...

I know, this sounds like science fiction, but it already exists.

Angelina has mutilated Herself because people should be more open minded about any type of self-mutilation.

I am not sure about which exorcist priest commented about self-mutilation being a symptom of demonic possession.

But in summary, both the message, and the messenger are strongly linked to the occult.

My 2 cents...

My sister in law died at age 48 of breast cancer that was in her brain, ribs, legs, scalp.........

My condolences to you.  It is truly an epidemic.  I wish we could trust our medical and pharmaceutical industries to tell us truth about what is causing this terrible suffering and loss of life.