Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: Emile "Francis Miller  (Read 4942 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Emile "Francis Miller
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2020, 01:28:47 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on July 18, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
Yes, Quo Vadis Domine. The reputation of the sedevacantist priest and the movement in general is far more important than the innocence of the children.
Like the Voris allegations against the SSPX prisets and those against the resistance priests. If true, they should be punished and we should not remain silent. We do not need more sodomites desecrating the Eucharist and raping our children.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Emile "Francis Miller
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2020, 01:31:24 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on July 18, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
Yes, Quo Vadis Domine. The reputation of the sedevacantist priest and the movement in general is far more important than the innocence of the children.
QVD's comments were more general in nature, but I suspect you knew that.  
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Emile "Francis Miller
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2020, 01:41:33 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on July 18, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
Yes, Quo Vadis Domine. The reputation of the sedevacantist priest and the movement in general is far more important than the innocence of the children.
I couldn’t care less whether he is a sedevacantist priest or not. The disgusting part is that you have no first hand knowledge and are anonymously trying to destroy a priest’s reputation without the slightest scruple. 
Logged

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
Re: Emile "Francis Miller
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2020, 01:42:45 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on July 18, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
Yes, Quo Vadis Domine. The reputation of the sedevacantist priest and the movement in general is far more important than the innocence of the children.
This was me:
I couldn’t care less whether he is a sedevacantist priest or not. The disgusting part is that you have no first hand knowledge and are anonymously trying to destroy a priest’s reputation without the slightest scruple. 
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Emile "Francis Miller
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2020, 03:11:07 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on June 29, 2020, 03:19:24 PM
He had some sort of camp for boys that he thought my son's should attend. That was creepy sounding to me. Needless to say we avoided him as well.

Well, by itself, holding a boys' camp and believing that boy should attend is not suspicious or creepy.  Perhaps there was something about HOW he said it?  If a priest appeared to be somewhat effeminate, registering on the gαydar, as it were, THEN such importunity might be considered suspect.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
« previous next »