being gαy isnt sin,
In this case Dolan is right. "Being gαy" is not a sin. Having gαy sex is what is sinful. Supporting "gαy marriagge" is sinful. Supporting the immoral agenda is sinful. Failure to avoid near occasions of sin is sinful.
A person who is tempted in unnatural ways against the sixth commandment commits no sin in the fact that they are tempted.
Spoken like someone with the Sensus Catholicus of Nancy Peℓσѕι.
Having an inclination to Sodomy is not "being gαy," it's having an inclination to one of the four sins that cry to heaven for vengeance. I can't imagine anything less
gαy than that. It's like calling someone with an inclination to commit murder "blithe" or "carefree." Someone who identifies himself as "gαy" - even if he does not indulge in the sin of Sodom - is not struggling with his cross like a Catholic ought to; he is identifying himself by his unnatural inclination and thereby allying himself with a perverted subculture that comes from the pits of hell itself.
And, for the love of God Almighty, stop calling the Sin Against Nature "gαy sex." Sodomites do not "have sex." The Sin of Sodom is as wholly different from the naturally ordered procreative act as murder is from childbirth. The biggest victory the Sodomites have won in society - and which has led to all their subsequent victories - was the snuffing out of the lively horror that their perversion formerly elicited in all normal people. Treating sodomy like it's just another carnal sin on par with fornication, referring to it as "gαy sex," using the fαɢs' own preferred nomenclature ("gαy," "LGBT," etc) are all hallmarks of a modern mind utterly desensitized to the horror of this most horrible of sins.