It's borderline misrepresentation, which is grounds for an annulment.
.
No. The only kind of misrepresentation that would have been grounds for an annulment before Vatican 2 was error of identity, i.e. if someone claimed to be someone different from who they actually were. This doesn't mean someone claimed to be a millionaire and actually wasn't. It means someone claimed to be someone else, as in, I tell some woman I am Brad Pitt, and get a good make-up artist to make me look like him. It's a pretty far-fetched scenario, obviously, and so was basically every other annulment scenario in Catholic times. That's why there were only a few dozen annulments granted by Rome each year
in the entire world before Vatican 2. I believe I heard the most common reason for an annulment by the Catholic Church was impotency at the time marriage was contracted.
.
Remember the story of Jacob in the Old Testament? That is an example of personal identity being misrepresented. Jacob decided to marry Rachel, and received her from her father Laban in marriage. In the actual wedding ceremony, Laban had his other daughter Lia show up, claiming to be Rachel. She was heavily veiled, as was the custom, so Jacob couldn't see her face, but she lied and said she was Rachel. It's a little hard to know why Jacob didn't notice the voice sounded different, but anyway, he thought the person who made her promises to him was Rachel, due to a deliberate deception perpetrated against him.
.
That's the only type of deception that would invalidate a marriage promise. I guess now in the Vatican 2 church they hand out annulments for any type of deception before marriage, but they don't accept what the Catholic Church teaches about the sacraments or much of anything else.